• hedgehog@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    If it’s prefetched, it doesn’t matter that you reveal that it’s been “opened,” as that doesn’t reveal anything about the recipient’s behavior, other than that the email was processed by the email server.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      But the path changes with every new data element. It’s never the same, so every “prefetch” is a whole new image in the system’s eyes.

    • undefined@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Personally speaking, I’ve never been a fan of this method because to the hosting web server it was still fetched. That might confirm that an email address exists or (mistakenly) confirm that the user did in fact follow the link (or load the resource).

      I have ad and tracking blocked like crazy (using DNS) so I can’t follow most links in emails anyway. External assets aren’t loaded either, but this method basically circumvents that (which I hate).

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        an email for a receiver that doesn’t exist, more often than not, goes back to the sender after e.g. 72h. That’s by design.