• Kempeth@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s completely baffeling to me how an advanced country like the US can still be stuck with such an obsolete system.

      • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same reason US politicians insist on having AM radio in cars, we mostly hate electronic voting, and a lot of people still like cold hard cash

        • it’s tangible
        • it’s reliable
        • it’s anti-fragile

        I say this as a tech enthusiast myself: we vastly, collectively underestimate the fragility of high technology. Not just fragility of the operation, but fragility in the supply chain (silicon manufacturing is super specialized and centered in one of the world’s most contested locations: Taiwan), fragility in the event of disaster, and fragility of the digital security.

        • szeis4cookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure that checks rate any better in security here, or in reliability. The check doesn’t have any mechanism within it to verify that there’s actually money to be moved, and doesn’t guarantee that the payment is yours irrevocably. It also doesn’t verify the actual intent to move money, or that the writer of the check is authorized to do so. I get that digital systems have vulnerabilities but let’s not pretend that this paper system doesn’t.

  • bjwest@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If some company or the government wants to charge me 3% to 10% or more to electronically pay, I’m writing them a check.