- cross-posted to:
- privacy@lemmy.ml
- firefox@lemmy.ml
- technology@beehaw.org
- cross-posted to:
- privacy@lemmy.ml
- firefox@lemmy.ml
- technology@beehaw.org
You must log in or register to comment.
If only Firefox would have a bigger userbase. I still use it, but the vast majority of people is on Chromium.
Mozilla is such a treasure.
Google already rolled out AMP which is overtly hostile to an open internet and faced zero repercussions from it. The same will be true for this. The average person has no idea what this means, doesn’t care, and won’t be bothered by it. Politicians always side with big business.
I’m hoping the average user will be sufficient annoyed by the lack of adblocking to finally give a shit.
Average users view the web raw, this will go totally unnoticed by >90% of users. If web-drm becomes a thing then it will be easy enough to block those sites and add them to the list of media that is morally acceptable to pirate.
Is there any reason Firefox or anyone else can’t just draw blank elements over the ads to block them on a separate layer? That way the site still thinks ads are being displayed. Kind of like the browser internal version of cutting out sticky notes and pasting them over your screen to cover the ads.
Firefox could get litigated for ad fraud and these trusted 3rd parties could block firefox from accessing the sites. It won’t work.
deleted by creator
Chad
