I don’t think it killed any rich people though.
I don’t think it killed any rich people though.
This officer likely faces more punishment for damage to his rifle than the damage caused by the raid.
They are supposed to float, just not always on the surface.
This is a non technical example of why we want net neutrality.
Successfully rehabilitating the wolf population to this point should be a moment of celebration. Assuming the goal was a sustainable population.
Having a physical HQ is a huge advantage for a country to have here.
It’s unpopular to say when the target work is focused on diversity, then the content isn’t relevant anymore.
5 isn’t better, it’s just got action sequences full of glaring problems.
Countries will get what they want from X or Instagram either way, see Brazil.
The rest of NATO is happy to let Turkey take the hit here. If the rest were on board Turkey would get in line like they did with Sweden.
For every mountain of skulls there were 10 villages that decided Mongolian rule wasn’t so bad.
It’s not just the prison system, a judge would likely get protective custody in a prison, which is almost solitary confident.
Credit scores exist because it’s harder to discriminate this way.
Amazon is a place where you have to deal with fake items and getting fraudulent returns shipped to you as new. Your reward for this is maybe a 5% discount.
It depends on the paper based on some quick searching, but I can pickup the paper from staples faster than Amazon will deliver it.
It depends on the product, but brick and mortar is superior to Amazon in some cases now. It’s mostly just things that are easy to ship that Amazon is cheap for.
Turkey is a NATO member, they might talk a good game, but they aren’t going to act against US interests. The blowback would be catastrophic for Erdogan and Turkey.
One side exists for the sole purpose of eliminating the other. Pretty sure war is inevitable in that scenario.
This is a big part of it. Dealing with China isn’t any better, but it probably won’t blow up on the leaders in their tenure so they might as well tag the bag.
2030 is insanely fast for no oil, it’s also way more aggressive than what the UK is planning. Net 0 emissions is different than no oil. Net 0 emissions means you still use a bunch of oil but claim planting a bunch of trees or an algae farm cancels it out. Net 0 emissions doesn’t mean stop using oil based products like plastic either. No oil is totally a different demand.
Also UK doesn’t plan on net 0 emissions until 2050, 2035 is just massive reduction in transportation emissions.