• Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Contracts aren’t invalidated because conflicting info is available somewhere else.

        What they signed in the contract is the deal they took, nothing more.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s capitolism, baybeeeee!!! Regulation free, the way it was meant to be!!! Where huge corporate interests dominate not only politics, but also the legal system, and healthcare systems! Where the only punishment is a fine so big the average citizen would consider it lifelong crippling debt, but the average corporation would look at it as a fraction of doing business. Because they have more money than anyone would ever need. That makes them better than you, and you know it.

          I’d now like to quote one of philosophys greatest minds.

          “In case you can’t tell, I was being SARCASTIC!!!” ~Homer Simpson.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It also wasn’t in the ToS/T&C. The FAQ is not a legal document, and I wouldn’t expect to need to read it if I read the T&C.

              • the_tab_key@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Except the possibility to keep the current price is no longer available, therefore, the consumer does not have the option to continue paying the same price, ergo TMobile forced the customer to change the price they pay, either to a higher amount for the same contact or to 0 for no contact. The original advertisement stated that TMobile would never change the price a customer pays, but it directly forcing this change by not offering the same contact.

          • warm@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s not false, but it is deceptive. Does the USA have an advertising regulator, or does it fall under the FTC? This kind of marketing should definitely be banned.

              • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t there already precident set in the 90s that EULAs do not have any holding in a court of law as a contract if the terms are labeled to be unrealistic? I swear someone sued microsoft because they did something in their EULA for Windows 95, and when it went to court, the judge said “yeah, fuck this…”

                And the thing about precidents is, once they’re established, courts generally tend to follow that precident, else it would mean that two similiar cases with similiar backgrounds were judged differently.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Hell. With the way life is going I’d settle for just regular roofies. I’m trying to adopt napping as a hobby. Seems like I’m happiest when I’m not awake

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      “where are you going to go, our competitors? manic laughter

      I would suggest an mvno but they are being eaten alive too so

          • ayaya@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I work from home and never call anyone so on Tello I pay $6/mo for 100 minutes + 1GB of data that pretty much functions as a 2FA delivery system.

            • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I have the same plan, but use it for places that insist on getting your phone number, that don’t need my phone number. So they get my second number that gets used a few times a year.

          • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Tello is my second line provider, they are quite good. I’m worried that tmo will squeeze them out, or end their agreement or something. Tmo is already doing shenanigans to lycra mobile, afaik, and they ate up metropcs, mint, and ultra.

            I trust tello. I don’t trust tmo.

        • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          USM repurposed an old subscription email system for their 2FA, and if you had opted-out of the advertising before, well you don’t get 2FA codes then. I spent a few days figuring this out with support. They removed 2FA from my account and explained the situation. A year later, I re-enabled 2FA, because SURELY they’d have fixed it by now, right? This was ~3 and 2 years ago, respectively.

          I’m still locked out of the account because they never fixed it. If that’s how they handle their systems, I want no fucking part of it. Can’t pay me enough to put a number I care about under their control.