• Malfeasant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Fahrenheit is fine for temperatures that humans can experience in our environment (and expect to survive, at least for a little while…)

          • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Friend: Hey, what’s the temperature? Me: Like 74°F Friend: I don’t understand… Me: Sucks to be you! You require precise temperature units and I follow advice from randos on the internet. See ya! 👋🥴

              • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                You want it to be true so bad. What if I’m not discussing the current location? What if I’m explaining where I’m from? We’re both in a mild, Mediterranean climate and I’m saying “oh it’s freezing back home” wtf does this mean? Are you suggesting we do away with measuring temperature at all?

                I only brought “precise temperature units” into my example because you brought it up. 😒

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I am mostly weirded out by the position of the zero. In Celsuis, zero is in the point that very visibly impacts the world. In Farenheit? Random winter temperature.

    • Drusas@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Fahrenheit is superior to Celsius because it’s more specific and I will die on this hill. 71F feels different than 72F and yet they’re both 22C (for example).

      Metric is better than imperial, though. Obviously.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The beauty of the metric system is that you can subdivide it infinitely to achieve any precision you wish. For example, you can have +22°, or +22.1°, or 22.15°, or 22.157°, etc.

        • Drusas@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Tenths of a degree are more noticeable in Fahrenheit than in Celsius for the same reason.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            But you’re using more digits, like if you’re writing 104.2 that’s 4 digits and still not as accurate as using four digits in Celsius like 41.12

            • Drusas@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Sure, but I never see people use two decimal points in real life when using Celsius to describe weather.

              • iopq@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Nobody uses decimal points in Fahrenheit, but it’s common using Celsius

                The only time I’ve seen Fahrenheit with decimal points is the saying that the normal body temperature is 98.7F

                Which is actually wrong, this is 37C, already a mild fever

                98.0F/36.6C is actually the normal body temperature

                • Drusas@kbin.run
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  People do use decimals in Fahrenheit, mostly when talking about body temperature.

                  And 98 is not what’s considered normal, though it is within the normal range. Closer to 98.6 is normal.