GitCode, a git-hosting website operated Chongqing Open-Source Co-Creation Technology Co Ltd and with technical support from CSDN and Huawei Cloud.

It is being reported that many users’ repository are being cloned and re-hosted on GitCode without explicit authorization.

There is also a thread on Ycombinator (archived link)

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Solution: create a GitHub repo with Markdown articles outlining human rights abuses by the CCP and have a large number of GitHub users star and fork the repo.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      create a GitHub repo with Markdown articles outlining human rights abuses by the CCP

      Once you have logged “China killed 100 Zillion people! End CCP now!” in Chinese GitHub, everyone in China will realize that their lives are actually very bad and they need to do a Revolution immediately.

    • Asherah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Maybe we should consider the same for the US government instead of being afraid of the big Chinese boogeyman across the sea? Because I guarantee you the US has just as many, if not more. But China bad. 🙄

    • Colonel Panic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      You’ve heard of CamelCase and lowercase and intVariableName variable naming styles. Get ready for:

      for (int Taiwan == 0; Taiwan < HongKong; Taiwan++) { int TianamenSquare == 0; … }

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Tankie whataboutism strikes again.

        Two things can be bad at the same time. Wild, I know.

        • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          “Whataboutism” is what Americans say to profess blind faith in their exceptionalism.

            • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              So you have even less reason to use the racist-in-origin and logically fallacious term.

              • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                Lmao it’s literally the name of a logical fallacy. How is the term itself fallacious?

                Also I harbour no racism or ill will toward the Chinese people. My girlfriend is Chinese and I care about her a lot and love learning about her culture. I just don’t abide the human rights atrocities committed by any government.

                  • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 days ago

                    1.it’s a euphemism for “And You Are Lynching Negroes” - that’s literally what people used to say instead of whataboutism

                    lol who do you think was saying this, and how is “whataboutism” in any way of a euphemism for it? Did you even bother to read the article you linked?

                  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 days ago

                    Hahahahahahahaha, oh man, how much you spend on a psychologist every month?

                    Also, what you’re doing is called sophistry, specifically moving the goal posts (which predates the US by about 1000 years).

                    You should probably educate yourself lest you expose the clown inside.

                  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    It’s funny how much effort you’re going to debating my word choice instead of the meaning and content of my rebuttal to your stupid comment. Do you have an actual point here? Are you claiming that what you were doing above wasn’t whataboutism? That it’s somehow a valid counterpoint to my joke about CCP censorship to say that the US also does bad things?

    • Tramort@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s the whole point of this: they will automatically filter that out, and this is an impotent, though well intended, gesture.

      • Azzu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        The real solution is to include a few tiananmenSquare variables in all the repositories. Either they exclude the entire repository or just the specific file, in either case the entire project may be unusable.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          So… You’re saying instead of “main”, “app”, or “core”, we should change the convention to make tiananmenSquare the entry point for apps?

          Or maybe make it the filename for utils, so it’ll just break

        • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s a new coding paradigm, I will take some time getting used to looking for libraries in the uyghur/tianamen folder.

        • Tramort@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          China filters every byte of Internet traffic in and out of the country.

          It seems naive to think they can’t accomplish the same thing for a GitHub mirror.

          • Azzu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            They’re not supposed to, it’s just about blocking them from using the software :)

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah I figured as much. It was mostly a joke. At the end of the day, if stuff is on GH, people can take it. It’s barely even stealing. Unless the license disagrees of course but then you were putting a lot of trust in society by making it public in the first place.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s what I don’t get about this. Why does anyone care? Even this Chinese company, why do they care to clone it all? It’s already all hosted and publicly available.

          • irreticent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Even this Chinese company, why do they care to clone it all? It’s already all hosted and publicly available.

            Until it isn’t. Perhaps they are preparing for a future war with the US and assume their access to all that code will be blocked. They want to copy it now while they have access.

          • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Apparently they aren’t respecting licenses. It’s possible to have source code publicly available on GH but have it not be truly FOSS. But that’s generally not a great idea since you’re effectively relying on the honour system for people not to take your code.

      • Morphit @feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        How will they filter it out? If they just don’t mirror anything with ‘forbidden’ terms, we can poison repos to prevent them being mirrored. If they try to tamper with the repo histories then they’ll end up breaking a load of stuff that relies on consistent git hashes.

        • jorp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          I feel like the effort to make such a repo and make it popular enough to be cloned and rehosted is a lot more effort than someone manually checking the results of an automated filter process.

          The “effort economy” is hugely in favor of the mirroring side