• MrMobius @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Don’t people use it mainly as a calendar? You can see events near you and get alerts to those you’ve signed up for. There are alternatives of course but I feel a lot firms and people publicize their event through Facebook.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It has all the local groups and my friends and family. I like to see what’s happening locally and with my friends and family.

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sorta’. Far from actively. The landscape is unrecognizable from it’s origin and the way it’s used is even more foreign. It’s 95% ads.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    That thread is hardly accurate. Lemmy acts holier-than-thou about social media, so most people that do use Twitter or Facebook didn’t post because they’d be shit on or have memes created about how they use social media owned by evil robots.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m a hobbyist photographer. Facebook and Instagram are my main outlets to show off my work right now. Fortunately my livelihood doesn’t depend on that hobby, but I’d still rather have the online presence.

  • atocci@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    In comparison to things like Twitter and Reddit, Facebook has actually been the most difficult to completely abandon because of Messenger. All my friends use it, and an attempt at switching everyone to Signal didn’t manage to stick. I would delete my Facebook account right now if it were possible to separate the two services.

  • Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, it’s always surprised me a little bit just how strong they still are. While the often-online do tend to shy away from it, it’s actually still a preferred platform for the less-online, due to how easy it makes coordinating real life events. Also not the sort of segment that usually cares much about data privacy.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes because none of them have a goddamn phone number, can’t talk to em unless you have a facebook account!!!

      Jesus fucking Christ what a bunch of bullshit

    • JiveTurkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Everyone seems to make this excuse for using Meta like it’s no possible without meta. They’re a piece of shit company, we shouldn’t be making excuses to stick around.

      • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Social media has barely been around for 20 years, we kept in contact with those we wanted to just fine before it. But now with social media you’re in contact with all of them all the time, even the ones you aren’t particularly excited to see once a year on the holidays.

        • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I actually tried to use marketplace a few weeks ago. It was an unmitigated disaster. People either didn’t respond, had stale posts for items, or couldn’t get their act together to have a conversation (even with 12 hours between messages) about how to get shit out of their house. I have never yearned for old-fashioned yard sales so much.

      • H1jAcK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Come up with a reasonable replacement product, and do it through an ethical company, and people might switch. But you’re not gonna convince people to give up the convenience they’ve relied on for a decade without a really good reason, and “this company is evil” is way too esoteric for most people.

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          "this company is evil” is way too esoteric for most people.

          Good point, and to push their argument further… what company isn’t? If they used that rebuttal i would have nothing to say.

          • jerkface@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Companies have forced everyone else out of what was previously a functioning non-commercial space. We have more choices than “evil company” vs “nothing”

            • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s all well and good to say to me, cuz i agree with you, but that line is useless to someone who is on a social media platform because others are, and it is easy, and what they know.

              These extra choices, the free ones… They gonna work as well as what they’re using? No. We’re not talking about netsavvy folks here. Can you rephrase your previous comment into one that is convincing for someone like that?

              Hell, related topic: even Lemmy.world, the largest instance i know of is affiliated with Meta in some way. Do you block Lemmy world? I don’t. I used to but was missing too much. So who would i be talking down to these folks?

          • Don_alForno@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            Deutsch
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh come on, that’s like “all politicians lie”. There is “I record every millisecond of your private life to sell to anybody with a fat enough wallet” evil and there is “I am raising prices this year because I can” evil. The two are not the same.