• M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Compromises all devices running … an IPv6 address.”

    Oh so no one is effected. (other then network nerds, and they are not real)

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Unfortunately (or fortunately, it depends on how you see it), some providers are already on IPv6. My Italian ISP has IPv6 with CGNAT, so all its users are on IPv6 without even knowing what it is.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Dang Italian network nerds! That will teach them for believing in a better tech future.

    • froh42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      IPV6 is already rolled out in parts of the world. My provider has a Dual Stack lite architecture, the home connection is over IPV6, IPV4 is normally being tunneled through a provider grade NAT.

      As I AM a network nerd, I pay for a dedicated IPV4 address every month, so I can reach my stuff from outside from old IPV4 only networks.

        • froh42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Because behind the carrier grade NAT I don’t get a routable IPV4 at all, so no inbound connections.

          With the IPV4 I use I do use dyndns now, so I can resolve it from outside.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Looking at the IP logs of the users on a website of mine shows that many people are already using IPv6 alongside IPv4. Some ISPs even don’t use IPv4 anymore unless you pay extra (Germany/Austria)