• Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    The qeustion would rather be, why shouldn’t software be free? Because there is no good reason it shouldn’t be.

      • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I forgot not everyone knows what free software means. Free as in freedom not free as in gratis. The other one has good, even great reasons for existing as you’ve said people need to pay the bills. The first one does not.

          • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, the english language has a problem with that. But not just English!

            Polish does too, the translation would be “Wolne oprogramowanie”. However wolne can be understood both as free and… Slow.

            Yeah, slow software lmao

            If you’d like to know more about software freedom checkout the Free Software Foundation, Software Freedom Conservancy, of course the GNU project and some Linux youtubers like Distrotube and the like.

        • OrekiWoof@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          This definition of “free” in the context of software is used only in specific circles. It’s confusing for everyone else and another word should be used.

      • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Perhaps if we built a world in which no one needed to worry about necessities, it would not be even excusable to charge money for commodities?