return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoUS can’t ban TikTok for security reasons while ignoring Temu, other apps, TikTok arguesarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square146fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkUS can’t ban TikTok for security reasons while ignoring Temu, other apps, TikTok arguesarstechnica.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square146fedilink
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 hours agoYou can just click deny instead. The law says the site must make it easy to do so.
minus-squareBlackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 hours agoThere’s a bunch of newspapers already with the option between pay for privacy plus or accept tracking. Fortunately there’s a third option which is leave the site and never come back. Plus most of the sites will ask you again after a period of time. Until you say yes. After that they can strangely remember your choice.
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 hours ago There’s a bunch of newspapers already with the option between pay for privacy plus or accept tracking. The EU has ruled that this isn’t sufficient and that people shouldn’t have to pay for privacy. Of course, companies in the USA won’t care, except for customers in California (thanks, CCPA and CPRA).
You can just click deny instead. The law says the site must make it easy to do so.
There’s a bunch of newspapers already with the option between pay for privacy plus or accept tracking.
Fortunately there’s a third option which is leave the site and never come back.
Plus most of the sites will ask you again after a period of time. Until you say yes. After that they can strangely remember your choice.
The EU has ruled that this isn’t sufficient and that people shouldn’t have to pay for privacy.
Of course, companies in the USA won’t care, except for customers in California (thanks, CCPA and CPRA).