Over the weekend my wife snapped a few pictures of our 22mo running around splashing in a lake wearing nothing except a shirt and a swim diaper. My wife was quite taken aback when she uploaded the photo to Facebook, and had the picture removed for nudity / inappropriate content. We all rolled our eyes and figured this was just an overtrained AI being an overtrained AI, but it’s got me wondering - is this attire getting to the point at this age where it really is inappropriate, and I’m just too fuzzed out from taking care of babies to notice? Curious to hear ya’lls thoughts.

  • sharpiemarker@feddit.deEnglish
    173·
    11 months ago

    On one hand, I agree with you, nudity is natural. On the other hand I’ve seen the kind of sick fucks that exist out there and I wouldn’t want a nude photo of my baby on the internet. So do with that what you will.

    • coehl@programming.devEnglish
      11·
      11 months ago

      Swim diapers cover quite a lot. This sounds far from any comparison to nudity.

      I would just say that it’s probably better to keep the Internet as unaware of your child’s existence as you can. Let them dictate what it knows about them when they’re older.

      • keeb420@kbin.social
        2·
        11 months ago

        I agree. Outside of something like a family photo at Disney world with Mickey mouse I wouldn’t want my kid to be in media released online. If I had kids that is.