“The election has already started. Absentee ballots have been sent. We need to catch up rapidly. We need everyone here to get active. We need to be clear about what our goals are. We are not in a position to win the White House, but we do have a real opportunity to win something historic, we could deny Kamala Harris the state of Michigan. And the polls show that most likely Harris cannot win the election without Michigan.”
Trump is actively attempting to court these dissatisfied voters. In September, he received the endorsement of Democrat Amer Ghalib, the Muslim mayor of Hamtramck, Michigan.
Many Arab American leaders, meanwhile, have strongly opposed a Trump presidency, citing his so-called Muslim ban on immigrants from several majority-Muslim countries.
Ahh, yes, what better way to push the country leftward than by letting the rightwing fascists come to power.
Articles like this are going to be everywhere when Kamala loses. They did the same thing to Nader in 2000, Bernie in 2016. It’s always third party voters or ‘foreign interference’. It’s never ‘we completely dissed the base and decided to lurch right and fund a genocide unconditionally’
The general idea of contests is that you don’t want your opponents to win.
Would you mind explaining how Harris can lose the election if Stein doesn’t win? Surely elections need to have a winner, and Sawant says it isn’t going to be Stein. Who do you think Sawant is saying will win according to the Greens’ strategy?
Good ELI5. Might need to shift down to an ELI3 though.
Actually, it’s to make sure you win, not blow everyone up with a big bomb. I’m pretty sure you’re a sore loser if you just focus on making sure one person bites it.
How many people has Jill Stein blown up with bombs?
