the International Colonial Court is overstepping its boundaries

The working solution is Marxism, that’s the antidote to capitalism and the ideologies that prop it up.

I agree with that, Liberalism as an ideology exists to justify capitalist relations and protect property rights. The mistake people make is in thinking that Liberalism is somehow progressive to begin with.

In practice, it’s like a coin with two very different sides. On one face, you’ve got political liberalism that’s all about individual freedoms, fair elections, and human rights. This is the feel-good stuff that’s used to market Liberalism and make it seem universally appealing.

But flip that coin over and you get economic liberalism, which is really just capitalism wearing a fancy philosophical mask. This side worships markets, treats private property as sacred, and assumes wealth accumulation is basically a human right. Since property rights are seen as the foundation of all other freedoms, the system effectively locks in wealth inequality by making redistribution seem like theft.

That’s why liberals lose their minds whenever governments impinge on the rights of the rich or regulate corporations. In their worldview, any limit on property rights is a threat to freedom itself.

I thought this was a great take on the whole thing

https://orgrad.wordpress.com/articles/liberalism-the-two-faced-tyranny-of-wealth/

Is EU really going to put 500% tariffs on China and India given they’re the main importers of Russian oil? 🤔

That bill would impose tariffs of 500% on countries that imported Russian oil, Barrot said.

I mean… not false

The states is literally running a proxy war against Russia using Ukraine, but yeah we’ll just ignore that important context because it doesn’t fit with the narrative you’re peddling right?

It’s a really convenient narrative based on the fallacy of homogenizing Ukraine. Let’s take a look at a few slides from this lecture that Mearsheimer gave back in 2015 to get a bit of background on the subject. Mearsheimer is certainly not pro Russian in any sense, and a proponent of US global hegemony. First, here’s the demographic breakdown of Ukraine:

here’s how the election in 2004 went:

this is the 2010 election:

As we can clearly see from the voting patterns in both elections, the country is divided exactly across the current line of conflict. Furthermore, a survey conducted in 2015 further shows that there is a sharp division between people of eastern and western Ukraine on which economic bloc they would rather belong to:

Either you’re intentionally spreading misinformation here, or you’re far too ignorant to discuss the subject you’re attempting to debate here.

Why would you lie about something that’s well documented, this isn’t reddit.

Burgerland occupies Hawaii and part of Cuba just to name a couple of places, but sure it’s defending sovereignty of a nation where it overthrew the legitimate government in a violent coup. 🤡

the least propagnadized lemm.ee lib has logged on everybody

“In principle, there would seem to be no reason why this mobilised defence effort cannot be maintained for quite a long period of time,” writes Mr Cooper, in a recent study for the RUSI Journal which surveys many of the facilities discussed above. “It is not without irony,” concludes Mr Cooper, “that advanced Western economies may now find the need to look closely at Russia to understand how to adapt.”

it’s just chauvinism

lol, it’s a surprisingly sober analysis language notwithstanding

Absolutely no reason to expect that the US will survive as a country at this point.

Ukraine allowed itself to be cynically being used as cannon fodder by NATO. That was the game plan all along.

Given that universities in US are effectively run as a business nowadays, the fact that they’re becoming insolvent should be more than mildly concerning.

for sure, these people really do think they live in a fantasy show

I mean Times of India is about as reliable as any source on this. The reason I’m not treating it as reliable because I don’t treat anything Trump says seriously, not because of the particular source.