• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So your argument against mine is that Ukraine didn’t respect an agreement that wouldn’t have been necessary if Russia had respected an agreement signed 20 years prior? Really?

    Russian spokesman: Recognizing the Donbas republics would not be compatible with Minsk agreement.

    Putin: I recognize the Donbas republics and the agreement no longer exists.

    You: Ukraine is at fault.

    The propaganda worked well with you I see 👍

    Off to the block list with all the tankies you go!

    • metapod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What a convoluted mess you have written, and what about that habit of yours of putting things in other people’s mouths? But let me address the raised issues: Ukraine did sign the Minsk agreements, just like Russia signed the Budapest memorandum, which were not conflicting proposals. It doesn’t matter which one was signed first, but rather which one is broken first, and by which party. Russia only entered the territory of Ukraine officially in 2022, whereas the Minsk agreements have been proposed and revised since 2014 with no results, and it was confirmed that Ukraine never had intentions to fulfill any of its obligations and were using it as a cover to militarize the country further. You talk about propaganda, but it’s precisely propaganda that makes you so quick to dismiss all the undesirable information and shut down conversation that is not going your way. I’m afraid your “tankie” block list will continue to be expanded.