• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    There should always be a reserve supply of vacant properties to give people freedom of movement between regions and cities.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        65M is what percentage of 1.4Bn? It’s about 5%.

        5% oversupply is pretty reasonable, especially given that the housing isn’t fungible and the populations are more mobile than the houses are.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        That doesn’t actually mean there are 65 million surplus properties. A vacant house isn’t an unnecessary house. Children move out all the time, families sometimes break up, Chinese citizens currently living overseas or in Europe return home, etc.

        I bet there’s actually math for this - I wonder if anyone has calculated the optimal amount of vacancies?

          • zephyreks@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sometimes, you misspeculate. Some developers lost a whole fuck ton of money on the project, but that’s more than made up for if you can turn a profit on projects near big cities (which demand is still sky high for).

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            I still find it hard to believe that they are making the best use of labor and materials

            Is anyone? If I have to choose between “housing shortage” and “housing surplus” I know which society I would prefer.