• DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    Probably because it’s going to be like hypothetically shearing wild deer. Good luck without deer tranquilizers and an iv bag/meds of night night.

    • Froyn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      Himalayas makes me think cold. So maybe they freeze to death if you release them naked like that? If you keep them around until it regrows, well that’s domestication.

          • Decoy321@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            You can actually do it on a much shorter time scale, depending on the species in question. A Soviet scientist in the 50s started it with foxes and had noticeable results by the 4th generation, less than 2 decades later.

            The real catch here is in the semantics, defining your terms and expectations. How much genetic drift you’re aiming for, and what traits you select, what results are functionally “good enough”, etc…

            In this example, we probably don’t need fully domesticated animals, some tamed generations should be good enough.

            • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              But foxes are canines and have a great record, thanks to those fox experiments, of being rapidly domesticated. But canines have lots of pups quickly. Sheep are so much slower on that front which dramatically increases the length between generations. Even “domestic” rams with thousands of years of breeding are still barely “tame”.