• bender@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not here for a debate OP, just here to post the information you promised and didn’t. As a bonus, I gave you a primary source instead of a propaganda rag!

      I’m sure other people here enjoy arguing against someone with the IQ and demeanor of a brick wall, but if I wanted that, I’ve got four right here.

      • Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not here for a debate

        Sir, this is the internet.

        You should understand that your report is not a primary source. It cites one single primary source, the ASPI, a propaganda rag.

        • bender@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The official UN news site isn’t a primary source for UN statements on China’s genocide, you got me. I cede all of my points.

          Sir, this is the internet.

          Yeah, and the internet is for porn, not debating deluded people on the internet.

          • Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Looks like you’re here for a debate after all! Porn and debate, together at last! The debunk gets everywhere.

            You missed my posting above of a thorough discrediting of that report. Believing what you want to believe despite all the evidence (or the complete lack of) is definitively delusional.