• BrikoX@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not a laywer, but after consent is withdrawn court should rule that everything after that point is inadmissable evidence.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s assuming they actually looked without permission, of course.

      If they image your devices and you withdraw consent, they could always get a court order at any time to examine the contents if they haven’t already taken a look.

      • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Right, but they can’t use the data from the device to get the court order to examine it to make it legal to use. Order of things matter here.

    • this_1_is_mine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      “Don’t worry we ended up having a parallel investigation that got us the info we needed…”