• jarfil@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 months ago

    No. This is just one failure to replicate. There would need to be many more attempts, an investigation, and actual proof of how they made shit up, to confirm they were making shit up.

    • ArtZuron@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yup, you never know what the cause of the discrepancy could be. It seems even the original team could only get it to work 10% of the time anyway, and they were familiar with the process. Even with detailed instructions, another unfamiliar team may not be able to recreate it even that often.

      Until they determine what factor is leading to the occasional creation of the product, it’s effectively random whether they will create it or not. It could theoretically take 1000 tries to get it to work once. Or 1,000,000 times. But, it will probably take around 10.

      That is, of course, if the product they claim to have made is real. If it isn’t real, then they’ll never get it. And, if they can figure out what exactly is making it or not, then they should be able to adapt the process to near perfect odds.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Reminds me of race conditions in programming.

        1 in 15 times the bug happens and you can’t figure it out, but if 2 asynchronous events happen to happen within 10ms of each other it breaks.

        Could be some super specific timing on one of the steps where a discrepancy of a short time doesn’t seem meaningful but is