maegul@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 11 months agoFailed replication of claimed superconductor reported on arxivarxiv.orgexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1166arrow-down10
arrow-up1166arrow-down1external-linkFailed replication of claimed superconductor reported on arxivarxiv.orgmaegul@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·11 months agoWhat, one failed experiment about 15 minutes after the paper was first published is sufficient grounds for declaring the technology a bust is it?
minus-squarelaylawashere44@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 months agoNo but a previous history of making shit up and falsifying data along with a failure to replicate?
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·11 months agoThey don’t have a history of making stuff up. Just because one group did doesn’t automatically mean everyone else is. The probability that something is made up doesn’t change just because somebody previously did or did not make something up.
minus-squareErk@cdda.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 months agoJeez you seem like you have some personal vendetta against this lab
minus-squareThe Doctor@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoFor the last twenty-some years, yeah. Unfortunately. People love to hate on stuff.
What, one failed experiment about 15 minutes after the paper was first published is sufficient grounds for declaring the technology a bust is it?
No but a previous history of making shit up and falsifying data along with a failure to replicate?
They don’t have a history of making stuff up. Just because one group did doesn’t automatically mean everyone else is. The probability that something is made up doesn’t change just because somebody previously did or did not make something up.
Jeez you seem like you have some personal vendetta against this lab
For the last twenty-some years, yeah. Unfortunately. People love to hate on stuff.