So my company decided to migrate office suite and email etc to Microsoft365. Whatever. But for 2FA login they decided to disable the option to choose “any authenticator” and force Microsoft Authenticator on the (private) phones of both employees and volunteers. Is there any valid reason why they would do this, like it’s demonstrably safer? Or is this a battle I can pick to shield myself a little from MS?

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Can you claim that you don’t have a smartphone? Then they’d either have to provide an alternative authentication method, or provide you with a phone.

    I’ve been part of the Microsoft Bad crowd for well over 25 years now, but there are a few things that I will concede that MS has done well. Authenticator is one of them. I haven’t looked much into the privacy aspect of it, though.

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If it has Microsoft’s name on it, the privacy implications are horrendous. Guaranteed.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Strong disagree with Microsoft Authenticator being well done - anything that is needlessly incompatible with competitors is bullshit. Either make your authenticator use the standard or fuck off.