Q. Is this really as harmful as you think?

A. Go to your parents house, your grandparents house etc and look at their Windows PC, look at the installed software in the past year, and try to use the device. Run some antivirus scans. There’s no way this implementation doesn’t end in tears — there’s a reason there’s a trillion dollar security industry, and that most problems revolve around malware and endpoints.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    I did an interview where the candidate said that if it’s one line, it runs in constant time. And they were completely serious. And this was in the context of Python list comprehensions.

    They claimed this ran in constant time:

    new_list = [value for value in my_list]
    

    Whereas this ran in linear time:

    new_list = []
    for value in my_list:
        new_list.append(value)
    

    We asked clarifying questions, like what happens to the runtime if the list gets really large, and they doubled down.

    And this was for a senior Python dev position… No, they didn’t get the job.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        No, constant time means it’ll take the same amount of time whether you have 10 items or 10,000.

        A list comprehension will take roughly the same amount of time as a for loop, it’s just syntactic sugar.

        • suction@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Thanks!

          Not sure why you needed to downvote my honest question, maybe the candidate dodged a bullet there, he he he.