• jorp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    What do we need ISPs competing on if the infrastructure is run by the government? They can’t increase speeds, they can’t increase service availability, they’ll just be getting a profit margin on top of what the government is charging them to use the communications infrastructure. I’d rather just pay the government the pre-profit amount

    • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      The infrastructure would be things like fiber cable wired to each house.

      But in this scenario, the ISPs would be manning the servers that your connection is routed through. So they’d still have massive influence on the speed and data.

      If the government owned the servers, they could block and track down anything against state interest.

      Not saying they can’t do that anyways, but at least the third party makes the process more difficult, less seamless, and gives the chance of new competitors.

    • Arsonistic@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Maybe I didn’t explain it the best way possible. By public I didn’t mean governmentally run, I just meant that anybody can use the infrastructure. It just forces a separation between the company doing the infrastructure and the ISPs, to prevent monopolies.