420stalin69 [he/him]

  • 0 Posts
  • 51 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 7th, 2022

help-circle


  • But it probably is the case that Ukraine was stomping Russia for pennies on the dollar earlier in the war.

    When the aid was flowing the narrative was that this was a “good investment” which is why they sold you with this “pennies on the dollar” angle.

    Put down the slava pipe and have a look at what the cost basis is for western military gear vs Russian stuff. It’s rarely better than 5:1 even for basic stuff like shells and advanced stuff runs at around 10:1. The idea that it was “pennies on the dollar” is crazy shit.

    It’s all narrative. It doesn’t have a relationship to facts on the ground. It’s a sales pitch.



  • I think the weakness of Ukraine is also narrative.

    Whatever narrative they push, it’s completely unrelated to the truth.

    When they wanted western sympathy and when the western funds were rolling, it was the plucky tractor brigade killing Russians at $1.40 a kill.

    Now that they aren’t getting another aid package, the front lines are about to collapse and Russia will be in Warsaw by summer.

    It’s all bullshit. As in it’s unrelated to the truth. The truth has no relationship to what Zelenskyy says.

    The fact Ukraine is starting to push an imminent collapse narrative is a key factor in me believing collapse is not in fact imminent.




  • The “Nazi economic miracle” is a myth that doesn’t die.

    Wages fell by 15%, manufacturing production fell despite the stimulus spending, and the reduction in unemployment wasn’t actually anything to be proud of since even by official statistics from Goebbels their recovery was about as impressive as that as Spain or Greeces recent exit from the Great Recession - not very impressive at all and that’s before you factor in how they excluded women from the statistics, engaged in mass conscription and conscription labor programs (forced labor digging ditches isn’t an achievement), and also forced another half million workers such as Jewish laborers out of the Germany economy by various means.

    Even so unemployment was still staggeringly high by 1936 which is when the rest of the world had began to recover anyway.

    It wasn’t an economic miracle, it was a decade of German stagflation with lots of propaganda and for some reason people in the west seem to just implicitly trust Nazi propaganda. It’s an odd phenomenon.

    Historians like Overy and Kershaw have debunked this nonsense decades ago but still people love to say “but he did make the trains run on time” in this weirdly pining way.

    On top of that they borrowed like crazy to fund this lackluster pseudo-recovery and had they not looted the coffers of Czechoslovakia, Poland, and France they would have faced an economic implosion even worse than the Great Depression - which they faced anyway in 1945.

    Also are you saying “economic growth is fascism”?




  • The qualifier “progressive” is used to describe a liberal who supports progressive social issues.

    Supporting gay rights or feminism etc, that’s being a “progressive” (loosely speaking, it can be defined better than that.)

    You seem to want to insist all liberals are progressive liberals but they aren’t.

    That’s why the qualifiers “classical liberal” or “liberal conservatism” exist.

    In some countries the “Liberal” party are the socially conservative faction of society.

    You’re wrong to conflate liberalism with progressivism. That’s why they’re different words.

    You’re also wrong to imply that progressive stances are “owned” by “liberals”.

    You want to say “progressive liberal” is a tautology…. But it isn’t.



  • 420stalin69 [he/him]@hexbear.nettoLemmy@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Isn’t assessing the issue on the issue tracker “listening to input” though?

    Your options are

    • do it yourself and create a pull request
    • make a suggestion to the devs on the issue tracker, who have every right to reject it
    • start a discussion here if you believe a feature is important enough to have public debate

    That seems like a lot of options for listening to input to me.

    What exactly is missing that you want to see? How could you add what you see is missing?