2·
11 months agoYeah, it won’t. Only Plex’s own screengrabs.
CapgrasDelusion
- 0 Posts
- 38 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 9th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
For Plex:
In YouTube download-material settings: Extra-> check “generate nfo files”
In plex, create a library called “YouTube” or whatever you’d like, category set to “other videos”. Use scanner: “Plex Video Files Scanner” set agent to “Personal Media.”
Under Plex settings “Agents” make sure under both the “movies” and “shows” tabs that the “personal media” agent is set to use “Local Media Assets” and that that is top priority.
Plex will use the nfo files generated by ytdl for metadata.
I believe there is a dedicated YouTube series agent, but those can be finicky. This way, ytdl has already done all the metadata work.
5·1 year agoHaha, same. Stuck Prowlarr on there because why not? That’s the beauty of this setup. It takes no effort after gluetun is set, so no reason not to just attach anything even remotely questionable.
Docker with a gluetun container. This container’s only role is to connect to my VPN provider. Any traffic I want through the VPN is set to use that container as its network. If the VPN goes down, gluetun loses connection, any container attached to gluetun can no longer access the internet.
I use a qbittorent docker container for my torrent client but you can attach whatever client you’re comfortable with, as well as any other container you prefer be on a VPN.
While qbittorent has a built in kill switch, this works for everything. No VPN means no connection, period.
9·1 year agoDistrict court decisions in Texas are not binding in South Carolina. They’re not even binding in their own district.
Top of page 2:
Generally, district court opinions are not binding on other district courts or on courts of
appeals. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has made it clear, “A single district court
decision . . . has little precedential effect[, and i]t is not binding on . . . other district judges in the
same district.” Other circuits agree
I’m asking in good faith, how would Sanders have done it? He’d have the same Senate and same House.
Who do you think would have done better and how?
Biden’s policy and legislative record as President are far more impressive than anyone expected, and the author of this piece outlines how and why.
No one you’re responding to read it.
You mean the railroad thing where he got them the sick days they wanted after the news cycle stopped paying attention?
The gerrymandered house and the gerry-landed Senate make this impossible. Put whatever candidate you want to replace Biden. The results will be the same or worse.
We can’t even fill basic pentagon positions thanks to “Coach.” But Biden should have unilaterally fixed everything. Sure.
If he wins despite the massive “election interference” he faces, he is fully justified in unleashing the vengeance that is so prominent a part of his 2024 message. If he seems to lose … it’s clearly grounds for whatever extra-constitutional redress he and his supporters choose.
This was all true before she opened her mouth. He’s been laying the foundation for that for 3 years. He continues to, despite his indictments for doing so.
They’re not all stupid, but they’re all catering to stupid. With the exception of Chris Christie which is why he’s so far behind.
It’s less that he’s bought and more that he’s hoping to be bought. He’s seeking donations from other people with a vested interest in denying human made climate change. He’s not bought, he’s for sale.
3·1 year agoThat’s certainly quotes around a lot of things I didn’t say. I admit I need to do a better job seeing past my own biases.
I also admit OPs posting pattern is materially irrelevant to the contents of the Washing Post article on its own. I was just pointing out a larger pattern within the c/worldnews community as a whole. In that context someone with an agenda can have influence.
But I’m not sure why I did. They seem like a nice person and post good faith articles. This was probably a misaimed shot on my part, true or not.
I didn’t attack the source. I just pointed out that someone posting more than most on lemmy could push a certain point of view using any and all sources if they cherry pick.
If this is a play on my username, I laughed.
I actually read most of Nightowl’s submissions for the reason you mention, to read outside my “narrative.” But they have an agenda and people should know that.
Well that’s not anti-competative. We’re at or above Carnegie and Standard Oil levels of monopoly shenanigans.