![](https://lemmygrad.ml/pictrs/image/749c66ef-39e8-45ba-b483-2a3f8b18704c.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
You took Trump at his word about NATO. Do you also believe he is anti-war? You gonna block me?
Anti-colonial Marxism is as good as a country breakfast.
You took Trump at his word about NATO. Do you also believe he is anti-war? You gonna block me?
He is a Zionist and engages in partisan discourse within zionism. He is only critical of who is empowering the Zionist state. He still supports the project, and you agree he does. Being accepting of it absolutely makes him a Zionist. Isreal does not have the right to exist.
Bernie is a Zionist.
I guess it’s time to gawk at the Baptists for being caught up in their own discourse.
Union dues and used books.
Don’t vote
Yeah the confused Canadians need to get a clue
Exactly. Any threat to Israel is a threat to US legitimacy.
Spatial awareness and sensitivity, especially in doorways, hallways, and sidewalks.
It’s an easy game to play actually. Strict contructionists will only recognize discourse that can be understood in 1790, or whichever relevant time. They use dictionaries from that time and the writings of the amerikan founders to make their points. You won’t easily find anything from that era that implies “religion” is anything other than Christianity and it’s various sects. To assert otherwise would be to legislate without congress. So they can argue that excluding non-Christians and non-Protestants is in line with the intentions of the authors regardless of article 6.
Is it a perfect line of thinking without contradictions? Of course not, but neither is the counter idea that America was designed to accommodate non-Christians.
Don’t be such a cry baby
Hitchens is an Islamophobic coward that endorses genocide. His opinion can be disregarded.
It doesn’t even make any sense period. States are the ones that delineate “rights.” A sovereign state would never need to affirm its “rights” or have them affirmed, unless their sovereignty was conditional.
So, all of this is a show the international (imperial) community plays to endorse the genocide. The US gives the occupier of Palestine the “right” to defend itself from blowback and demands support from its other vassals and victims to solidify the sovereignty of an illegitimate project through their recognition as legitimate players. Yet this seemingly challenges the sovereignty of the project, almost as if it is just a US colony in need of permission…
The US would never - maybe not even rhetorically - rely on rights granted to it by the international community to assert its imperial sovereignty. The society of states is such a fucking joke.
social media
Supply creates it’s own demand. Capital knows this. That’s why they push your narrative.
“Just read the first and last sentence of each paragraph”
At first I thought it was cool but now its clear lemmy will just be turned into reddit.
“Sending”