• 1 Post
  • 68 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 4th, 2023

help-circle
  • There is some things I would have liked to keep up on, but Lemmy has a lot of the stuff I am interested in, and Discord covers some other bits. I use social media less which is good. I am more productive and sleep quicker.

    The FOMO is the brain craving dopamine. The solution is getting used to less, not chasing more.

    Make the internet work for you, not the internet working you.


  • CrypticCoffee@lemm.eetoPrivacy@lemmy.mlSkiff is improving every day
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oh I know. It is your call. I’ve not seen much evidence of tutanova/proton Lemmy adverts. This service is quite new in comparison and there is clearly some astroturfing on lemmy. We don’t know how good or bad they are tbh. The fact they are pushing it rather than relying on word of mouth is a little sketchy.

    Whether it is deleted or not, I’ll at least call out advertising so people are aware rather than being led to believe it is recommended.


  • CrypticCoffee@lemm.eetoPrivacy@lemmy.mlSkiff is improving every day
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    We don’t know what it is, but there is history on Lemmy of them listing out every feature, asking I’d anyone used it as they didn’t. Why woupd anyone do that? More blatant in the past, but worth being on guard against them.

    Plus advertising e2e encrypted emaill which is impossible unless recipient is same service.

















  • CrypticCoffee@lemm.eetoPrivacy Guides@lemmy.oneleaving google
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    “we do not process email content to serve ads” looks very specific. We don’t process emails to serve you ads. It doesn’t say they don’t process ads to understand better what is relevent to you. It is also a very specific word, serve. Serving means displaying, but it doesn’t necessarily mean profiling or targetting.

    Ads are shown based on: “ads that were selected to be the most useful and relevant for you”. So, they’re saying they don’t directly do that, but it doesn’t cover indirect processing that would feed into this.

    These people are very clever, and hire very clever lawyers that could easily demonstrate this in a court, so they could use that information and still meet the requirements of the policy.

    Considering the astounding level of information gained from Android that feeds into their tech, it would be quite naive to believe they’ve ring fenced email as something they don’t touch. Google still serve very relevant content to people that don’t use search and don’t stay logged into email. I cannot imagine it’s a fluke. Email is a very expensive game to be in when you’re insinuating that all they want is to be an identity provider to assist in tracking web interactions.