![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
It’s much less abstract; more directed, logically laid out and verbose.
So it is actually a useful, constructive discussion piece, instead of your quoted line.
It’s much less abstract; more directed, logically laid out and verbose.
So it is actually a useful, constructive discussion piece, instead of your quoted line.
Thanks for official figures. However his comment is valid still.
So you think Adobe is too big and should be split up?
If they can get away with it, by maybe burrying it in page 137 of the EULA, then yes.
I vaguely remember win 8 coming with lots of invasive features, that were able to be disabled by a application which had such lists of registry edits needed.
Also: Microsoft backports privacy-invasive features to windows 7 and 8 Many of these have effectively hidden Customer Experience Improvement config values in “help” menu of the program.
Just keep breathing in that copium, while Microsoft already specifically starts banning programs that are a curated-ish list of privacy-sensitive things to disable on windows at one click.
Freedom requires effort, and always did.
Maybe more lately, but such is life
They should not censor the company name.
Aaaah, I would love it if people had to carry a visible law-mandated label saying “May contain bigotted and un-read-up (i.e. dumb), toxic opinions about all things” unless they pass some psychological exam.
Brave new world.