LovesTha🥧

@ExtremeDullard thinner first layer (many profiles default to a thicker first layer), colour sequence too.

Those would be the first things I’d try.

@PhatalFlaw @destructdisc increase in retail sales indirectly but quantatively measures it. Or at least it probably does, it’s hard to imagine that more relaxed shoppers aren’t more likely to return sooner.

@over_clox ah, yes, might makes right.

For reference, when was the street invented? And for what?

@over_clox Yes, the concept is from rail, but it applies to all crossings/intersections.

The point is we lost a lot when we decided that it was okay for death machines to have right of way all around us. We shouldn’t accept it as normal.

@over_clox bad typing, corrected now

@over_clox why are cars allowed there. That is the way around I’m pushing

@over_clox at grade crossings should be rare ;)

@over_clox The key bit there being, why are cars allowed on things that were safe for pedestrians?

@lgsp I’m a fan of requiring them over 25kmph. Yes this is largely unenforcable, so no one will be fined. But it still gives the message that if you go fast you should wear one.

But it also gets out of the way of people riding to the corner store for milk

@over_clox @lgsp no, motorised vehicles shouldn’t be able to hit pedestrians and cyclists. Mostly because their is a right to walk, not drive a car.

@walden @horse manually creating segments on regular routes is labour, but not too burdensome.

Segments on one off routes don’t have much value on a small instance.

I’m interested to see how it works.

@atzanteol @CompactFlax read the article, it is just expanding the current vehicle laws it include cyclists.

So in all likelyhood cyclists will get slaps on the wrist like drivers to.

@limelight79 @versefedi Attempted Manslaughter feels like an oxymoron to me. Attempted requires intent and Manslaughter requires lack of intent?

@Fingolfinz @anindefinitearticle and only replaces the tubes, it still needs to be retread at some interval. So ‘lasts the life of the bike’ is a bit misleading…?

(Just going by the linked article)

@Sidhean @GertrudGoethe The solutions are very generic too :)

@Grass @muelltonne It really makes that much of a difference?

@m4m4m4m4 @br3d Also “make things worse for drivers” can be things that sound bad but actually mean nothing. Closing half the lanes through a CBD has no impact on traffic, but it sounds really bad for drivers.

@Obelix @Treczoks bikes are outside and GPS is pretty cheap to receive these days too.

@Doofytoe @grumpo_potamus When I commuted regularly rain on the way to work was a reason not to ride, the risk of rain on the way home wasn’t. Maybe if the office had a good shower I would have ridden to work in the rain too.

deleted by creator