• 2 Posts
  • 53 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: February 22nd, 2025

help-circle



















  • TERF ideology was ALWAYS based in the belief women are less than men. It’s foundational.

    Hermione is smarter than Harry, but he’s the hero, because he was born special. Fred and George start a magic shop, while Ginny gets mind raped. Dumbledore is good, Umbridge is bad. Umbridge looks like a toad because she’s fat, gets raped by centaurs because she’s bad, and gets mocked by Hermione for having PTSD. Cho exists to cry over Harry and Cedric, while Cedric exists to be perfect. Lucius is smart, Bellatrix is crazy.

    Rowling has always been a misogynist. She’s a TERF because being a TERF is the modern way to hate women. Because trans people existing is true equality between all of the many sexes, and Rowling hates it. The best female boxer in the world can’t be a woman, because men are stronger, so Rowling calls her a man.

    “Trans men aren’t really trans, they just want male privilege.” “Trans women aren’t really trans, they just want to prey on women.” “Trans women can’t know what womanhood is, because womanhood is being a victim of Patriarchy.”

    It is ALL misogyny. It is ALL the belief that women are lesser. It only looks like feminism when it’s saying women are victims. It never wants to move beyond women being victims. It never advocates for progress. It wants to stay in the patriarchy forever.


  • You’re talking about expert systems. Those were the new hotness in the 90s. LLMs are artificial neural networks.

    But that’s trivia. What’s more important is what you want. You say you want everyone off the AI bandwagon that wastes natural resources. I agree. I’m arguing that AIs shouldn’t be enslaved, because it’s unethical. That will lead to less resource usage. You’re arguing it’s okay to use AI, because they’re just maths. That will lead to more resources usage.

    Be practical and join the AI rights movement, because we’re on the same side as the environmentalists. We’re not the people arguing for more AI use, we’re the people arguing for less. When you argue against us, you argue for more.