No, you’re thinking of philosophy. Philosophy is a discussion. Science is a process. Just the fact that they are being accused of being misleading and outright falsyfyiing evidence is enough to simply ignore their purported results until they can produce a paper that fixes all those problems.

It’s not a discussion whether we can agree on something. The evidence should do the only talking.

Don’t spread it around. It’s a complete fraud of a paper for all we know. Just the fact that it has convincing rebuttals is enough to make you consider it irrelevant.

I remember reading this simply terrible article in Scientific American; the entire article was based on this research paper referred to the meme above.

The paper was a complete fraud, and people just guzzled the cool-aid. He’ll they still do, looking at this thread.

Get a grip, dude.

Mm, is that why Silent Hill 2 sits on ‘Overmevmingly positive’ while still plagued by serious performance issues?

The statement is simply not true; gamers are willing to swallow just about anything if sold correctly.

Sure, go ahead by all means, or you could take this as an opportunity to learn and grow as a person.

Does it ever occur to you to just concede for once and save so nich time and effort: ‘No, sorry, I don’t have a source for my claim, I simply made a conjecture that I believe to be correct’.

I bet it never even crossed your mind because you’re so goddamned sure of yourself since apparently ‘you don’t live under a rock’.

Yes, of course, your source of why Putin made the endorsement, the source I asked for about 5 comments ago…

I just cited a quote. What do you want from me exactly(?) holy fuck…

The statement is the fact, and I put no more value to it than that. Make of that what you will, I really don’t care

Thanks. Not a surprise, really. But they also claim Iran is supporting Harris’s election, it’s just all over the place.

Yeah, like what?

Yeah ‘who knows’, I don’t.

So how the hell is that conjecture lmao?

No, ffs, I was just citing official sources, that’s the goddamn opposite

Better than armchair conjecture, tbh.

But holy mother of god!; what’s your source I mean?

No, I mean that the US government claims Putin support of Harris is false or a charade.

Because you, quote ‘don’t live under a rock’, was that the citation you consider a fact?

I dont really trust, either to be honest. What has the US government said on the matter?

I don’t need to explain anything. Again, I’m just citing facts, and you’re guessing. But honestly, how much do you think your armchair analytics are really worth? Or anyone’s for that matter?