Display name

They can’t have an opinion about privacy because they sell a service? :P

“I don’t trust you!” But they trust whatever NSA-agent looking at their private photos not to save anything for later…

Okay, the iPhone and the smartphones after it. Better? :)

Didn’t the iPhone come 2007?

The smartphone

There are no ‘no go zones’ in Sweden. It’s just an intentional misunderstanding by the far right party to fan hatred on immigrants. But nonetheless, there are areas which are for the worse socially and economically.

Just avoid Stockholm. Too many stockholmare. Visit Gothenburg instead

Graphene OS is about security, not privacy yeah?

Oh I do that too and I read somewhere that it’s pretty common to adapt different personalities to each language. I am by far more courageous and bold when have my English personality.

No, he climbs down, keep hindering the tanks, then gets dragged away by two others. There’s a full video somewhere

“No, thank you. And I wish that you refrain from contacting me again/about this or similar things.”

Ok, so the communist party says who can be in the Nation Assembly. The communist party sits on all the political power just by having the power over appointment. There are no free candidacy for the national assembly, effectively aggregating all power to themselves making them the de facto ruling class. See the issue?

This obviously doesn’t mean that I support the sanctions and you are intentionally misleading in saying so.

Removed by mod

Of course there’s a difference with seeing something from an objective viewpoint and agreeing or disagreeing with it?

Jan 6 movement is the coup attempt right?

That is a view I disagre with. Arresting peaceful protestors is always undemocratic.

Well you claimed that sanctions always are meant as a collective punishment?

That is not entirely true. It depends on the kinds of sanctions. This is why modern sanctions have shifted from punishing the citizens in hope of them rising against the regime to pin targeting the leaders and the ruling class.

The catastrophe and starvation in Iraq (I think it was Iraq) changed how sanctions were used.

No that sounds reasonable. I know that there are plenty of states that have the president/government appoint judges to the high court. It can definitely pose a democratic problem but not necessarily. Do you know if the ruling party can dismiss them or replace them at will?

I do agree that the original idea behind the sanctions are despicable but if another country would impose sanctions based on the current reasoning, it’s a sound reason. I wholedhartly agree with the rest of the world being honorary cowards though, it’s extremely apparent when viewed in the light of Israel’s genocide against the Palestinians.

Sure it was. It diverted after the 70’s though. Any word in particular you think I don’t get the meaning of?