is the new york times a liberal or conservative paper
The New York Times is often perceived as a liberal or progressive newspaper, but its political stance is more complex and nuanced. Here’s a breakdown:
Historical context: The Times was founded as a conservative newspaper in 1851, and it maintained a conservative editorial stance until the early 20th century. However, during the 1960s and 1970s, the paper began to shift towards a more liberal perspective, reflecting the changing values and attitudes of the time.
Editorial board: The New York Times’s editorial board has historically been liberal, but not uniformly so. While it has supported progressive causes, such as women’s suffrage, civil rights, and environmental protection, it has also endorsed conservative candidates and policies on occasion.
Columnists and opinion writers: The Times features a range of opinion writers and columnists, including liberal voices like Paul Krugman, Maureen Dowd, and Charles Blow, as well as conservative voices like Bret Stephens and David Brooks. This diversity of opinion reflects the paper’s commitment to presenting a range of perspectives.
Coverage and reporting: The Times is known for its in-depth reporting and investigative journalism, which often focuses on issues like government corruption, corporate malfeasance, and social justice. While this coverage can be seen as liberal-leaning, it is also driven by a commitment to fact-based reporting and a desire to hold those in power accountable.
Subscriber demographics: According to Vox, The New York Times’s subscribers skew “older, richer, whiter, and more liberal” than the general population of the United States. This may contribute to the perception that the paper is liberal, but it’s essential to note that the paper’s editorial stance is not solely determined by its subscriber demographics.
In conclusion, while The New York Times has a liberal bent, it is not a uniformly liberal or conservative paper. Its editorial stance is shaped by a complex interplay of historical context, editorial board perspectives, and the diverse range of voices and opinions presented in its pages. ----Brave Search
If you mean GOP, I don’t understand…Georgia’s largest newspaper or the New York Times aren’t right leaning at all
So your idea is basically just lie to the American people some more until Biden wins and then put someone else in charge? Sounds about right
If he cared about the country, he would’ve already stepped aside, but I don’t see it happening. They’re already trying to excuse his performance saying it was a cold, then saying it was the cold medicine. They’re kinda stuck with him now, but it’s their fault. They’ve been lying and covering for him the last 3 years so they might as well keep it goin.
I did use F-Droid, now I use Obtanium. I use Mull Browser as well, but I really like Fulguris Browser better
Removed by mod
It makes sense to show a state id in order to vote for a a few reasons. It insures that you’re a citizen of this country, that you are who you say you are, and it also stops people from being able to fill out absentee/mail-in ballots in other peoples names and then dropping them off at ballot box locations which is something that we know is happening similar to this case. https://ctmirror.org/2024/06/11/bridgeport-wanda-geter-pataky-arrested-absentee-ballot/. Granted, that was a local election and not national, but it can obviously happen either way and it’s very easy to get away with. In this particular case, the video that caught them dropping the ballots in the ballot boxes were set to be deleted in 30 days after it was captured. They got lucky that a fire station across the street noticed the same woman dropping off tons of ballots at the ballot box across the street from them and they gave the video to one of the campaigns and that’s what got them reviewing other ballot boxes around town in which they found more evidence of the same thing happening at those.
It is on absentee ballots. It’s got a question on it that ask if you’re a US citizen and you check yes or no, no proof needed
Removed by mod
and the solution they’re offering is to do away with it entirely in favor of Hungarian or Russian style authoritarianism.
Where do you get this from?
I’m getting downvoted because it doesn’t fit their narrative. I don’t care about that though. It’s expected