Or Trump up some wild charges about tax fraud or something

So we want Google and such to ignore laws when we think they should be ignored? Who decides which is which then?

I don’t get the premise of posts like that. We scold Google and other corps for not following the laws they are supposed to follow (data protection for example).and then we scold them for daring to follow lawmakers, when we don’t like the laws they follow. Which is it?

Those malicious coders are too sly for that. Some write “Sh1t” to throw grep off, others even do a “B3g1n”… They are always one step ahead!

I’d expect them to properly comment it with “#-------Begin malicious shit--------”.
COMMENT YOUR CODE, PEOPLE!

How can this be damaging if you ain’t trying to sell it to us in the first place?

Sine we know that E=mc², we can substitute and then subtract E, getting
BTC=AI
so either AI is the blockchain, or this equals-sign is to be read as “just as bullshit as”.

Or someone who’s so deep into GPT that they mimic its style subconsciously.

Perhaps what they developed is a bunch of Windows 2005 Servers stacked on top of each other

Perhaps their “stack” only ever uses caddy

Can we all agree to call this vulnerability “Poobear”?

Added an usb drive by its /dev/sd** identifier to fstab without the nofail option. Wanted to do a quick reboot for something I can’t remember, then copy the files over to the USB drive, since I’d need them on the next day and… no boot. The reboot had assigned another name to the drive (/dev/sdb instead of /dev/sdc or something) and automount wouldn’t skip it because nofail was missing. In the middle of the night, with files I required right the next morning. Fun times.

That, again, is not how governments work.
What you depict is how companies work: You save amount X on something, so there are X moneys left to invest in something.
Governments work with separated and highly regulated budgets. That is sometimes bullshit, but sometimes necessary to make sure government aids are spent fairly, for example. So: You save amount X on something, you aren’t allowed to just give this amount to someone. There has to be either a program, a law, or (most often) an entirely different budget somewhere else that this someone is allowed to receive.

So the “trade-off” logic cannot be fulfilled by governments, and it shouldn’t be. Think about the myriad of bullshit, money would just be dumped into by the government if this wasn’t the case. On top of the myriad of bullshit that already made it through the nets, that is.

But are you using Arch tho?

That’s not how governments work

Don’t worry, folks. The crews of those planes are way more paranoid about anything that could happen than you could possibly imagine. I’d bet the time a standard go-around takes has about tripled for most Boeing flight crews with new-ish jets

Breaking news: Water has been found to be wetter than desert sand!
More after the weather report!

Welcome back to TIM BER BORNERS

Here in Germany, the chocolate manufacturer Milka (now part of Mondelez) has been doing that for at least 2 decades:
https://images-tastehub.mdlzapps.cloud/images/3c644c35-89b4-41fe-97af-8f4e1891accd.png?fm=webp&q=80

They contain some sort of mousse and have a tiny spoon in the carton.

Let me break down the explanations given, because most of them boil down to this:

As a noun, yes, because it’s mainly used in biology like that (“A hawk female”) and thus can come off as dehumanizing. As an adjective: No (“A female cashier”, “A male cashier”)