![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0d5e3a0e-e79d-4062-a7bc-ccc1e7baacf1.png)
Our sonic ran out of toys for their wacky packs this week. Also lettuce, onion rings, pretzels, and limes.
I’m assuming they’re having a major supply chain problem.
Our sonic ran out of toys for their wacky packs this week. Also lettuce, onion rings, pretzels, and limes.
I’m assuming they’re having a major supply chain problem.
I thought that was Harambe. Or was he the first sign of deviation?
So, while I recognize the last one was US-backed, do we have any evidence at this point to believe this one was also? From what I’ve read so far this seems like a more straight forward ‘you can’t fire me this is my country’ sort of thing.
Can’t imagine how this could be perceived as anything but retaliation for the EU daring to attempt to regulate Apple
If ace combat has taught me anything, it’s that there’s no reason we can’t do both
This is how field service jobs are written in my experience, yes.
This is not precisely accurate. These are individually addressible and can be commanded to change what’s displayed based on any arbitrary input, such as detection of a critical mass of apple products in that part of the store, or a device which is signed into a store account on the store app, accurate down to about 3 meters last time I looked at the state of presence analytics tech. So you absolutely could have 20% higher prices follow a person around a store if you wanted to.
Idk, isn’t something like OKC like… literally the opposite use case from what ActivityPub/The Fediverse was built to solve?
Won’t somebody please think of the shareholders
A lot of risk narcing on someone irl
I would imagine a production version of this would have predefined cut lines to pull a chunk out for working on stuff in or under the foundation
Well, so much for that
Nova got bought? Is that what happened to them? :(
No, but given the context when it was originally written, one would have a hard time finding any which weren’t. Especially if when you answer ‘yes’ it just asks you to list them, as there’s a big difference from the US’s perspective between having been part of a coop in the woods and a member of the Soviet Politburo
Peanut butter and chocolate, i don’t unstand how this is a question, like 30 people know about Lemmy
None that I’m aware of, but for a copyright to be asserted in the US a human must be associated with it as a consequence of the monkey selfie case. My reading is that this would cover the edge case of an anonymous, unknown poster submitting the work, allowing Cara to act as the default rights holder unless otherwise asserted by a person or user.
Most of the larger lakes in the region have similar organizations, Perry and Smithville over on the KC side as well as the Ozarks in south central all have sailing orgs to a greater or lesser extent.
No, it doesn’t. It states that the copyrighted works are the property of Cara and/or the artist who created the Works, except where otherwise noted. This specifically would cover cases where someone attempts to claim that a Work they found on Cara isn’t copyrighted because a copyright notice wasn’t explicitly stated, and doesn’t make explicit claims over the ownership of any arbitrary Work. For it to work in the way you’re claiming, the “or” cannot be present as it being there implies the existence of Works on the site which Cara does not have property rights to. Who actually possesses the property rights to any given Work is left, apparently intentionally, ambiguous.
See, the problem is that this all would have required retaining all those expensive engineers that were either terminated or bailed the second he got hands on the platform.
Not less standardized so much as when the only cooling loops were custom ones and not AIO