I’d love to see an explanation for that one.
I’d love to see an explanation for that one.
Endorsement means you like them. This makes it clear they do not.
Because I do not take your arguments in good faith because I do not discuss the justifications of genocide. Your argument is evil and I mean it in the purest sense I can muster. I consider you an evil person for actively holding and defending evil ideas of genocide. I do not respect evil people. There is discussion to be had on the topic but not with people like you.
“This is the only story of mine whose moral I know,” writes Kurt Vonnegut at the beginning of his 1962 novel Mother Night. “I don’t think it’s a marvelous moral; I simply happen to know what it is: We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be.”
Just cool with targeting civilians then. Damn. Normally y’all genocidal freaks like to do a little double talk to avoid saying it.
Not the can of worms you want opened in relation to Israel. Considering the large amount of interstate killing they get up to, civilian and State alike.
Man you go from “that apartment and all people inside were terrorists” to “oh the civilians actually also hate these terrorists” real quick. The line between civilian or terrorist is whatever you want.
Grammer Nazi. Gottem
Removed by mod
Opens your mouth but ain’t prepared to deal with gasp evidence…?
Facts, not feelings, and the fact of the matter is you are a genocidal person.
If the only thing stopping you from doing war crimes is a reason then your a scumbag.
Oh no, people are willing to die for their homes? Craaaaaazy.
Injury IS the atmosphere! Genius
That’s me in the corner That’s me on the came-ra Shitting my pants
You know what ruins the atmosphere? Injured people
Big brained independent thinker over here independently thunking away. What kinda ideas will they come up with? None, but he will make it clear he doesn’t like yours. Cause if he did then he wouldn’t be independent anymore!
Landlords do not build housing, nor do they do repair work. So I’m gonna say the scarry trigger word for all you libertarians out there to gasp at. Gubberment.
Imagine a world where housing was given on a per-need basis. People still need to travel for work and stay for months at a time, except it’s understood that the job getting done is more important than a landlord profiting off the fact you have to travel for it.
The lack of a landlord also does not prevent you from temporarily using open housing either.
Except that the people saying this are making a distinction between the two. Do you want to interpret what they are trying to say or do you wanna play word games? Disingenuous.