I don’t care what people say, the most important historical event in my lifetime was the discovery and release of the lost Steely Dan tape containing The Second Arrangement
Ok, just verifying that that fallacy wasn’t the crux of your argument
Are you implying that a negative categorically cannot be proven?
Let’s start with clarifying an element of the question:
Which characteristics define a god? Do these characteristics violate the laws of physics and/or internal logic? If these characteristics do not violate the laws of physics, then what aspects distinguish a god from a mundane or natural entity?
Steely Dan also mention it in “Any Major Dude Will Tell You”
I wouldn’t count anything that isn’t at least arguably as long as a movie. Wallace & Gromit: A Grand Day Out and the SpongeBob episode “Gary Takes a Bath” otherwise would count as well. There’s probably an otherwise qualifiable clone-focused episode of The Clone Wars, too.
Wikipedia says All is Lost has only 1 character, but I did find a SPOILER scene that shows Redford by someone else’s arm for only a couple of seconds. I’d figure this is the only scene with anyone else onscreen.
Bo Burnham: Inside?
In this case, no. This is the only version of this album, i. e. there wasn’t a revised version that would amend this error and force this version into relative scarcity. The band also isn’t popular enough for there to be much of a demand for anomalies such as a rare misprint. It’s really just the distributor being sloppy/lazy.
Unfortunately, it’s legit. Here is the Discogs page for the release and here is the album on Apple Music with the same labelling error.
deleted by creator
Fixed, thanks
I’ve had a Captcha that required an image like this one to be classified as a bike
Ceci n’est pas un vélo
I thought there were more people on Earth than that. Learn something new everyday huh
I’m very new to this site so I’m not sure what all already exists. Some features that come to mind based on my experience on Reddit and other sites:
I think if Reddit corporate wanted to make bot accounts that looked legitimate, they could do it. I would not be surprised if their god-like powers over the site would allow them to re-write the history of a sub and create fake posts that weren’t actually made in that subreddit at that time, or even falsify the age of an account. Ideally, the admins of a site would know the red flags of a bot account. Given that these are all on r/programming, that circumstantial evidence makes me inclined toward thinking these are made by a hobbyist programmer who is dissatisfied with the protest, rather than Reddit corporate astroturfing. However, if someone could provide a complete history of these bots’ comments and posts, that could provide some insight.
I studied bot patterns on Reddit for a few years while using the site and was active in their takedown. My username is the same on there if you want to see the history of my involvement. What drove me to stop being so involved in bot takedowns is the extent to which Reddit as a site was continually redesigned to favor bots. In fact, I woke up today to a 3 day suspension for reporting a spam bot as a spam bot. I think what we need to examine in these cases, if possible, is if the bots were made strictly for the purpose of contesting blackouts (i.e. by Reddit themselves) or if they were made by a hobbyist or spammer. Given that these are on r/programming, that makes it seem more likely that a hobbyist programmer made these bots for a laugh or something, rather than it being an inside job. If the usual resources of Reddit’s API were accessible enough to provide a total history of these bot accounts’ posts and comments, then that would help to clarify (this is what I mean about Reddit redesigns favoring bots). On the subject, I think Lemmy needs to start implementing preemptive anti-bot features while it is in an embryonic stage of becoming a large social media site (or a pseudo-social media site like Reddit) to future-proof its development
85% of the time, it works every time