Yes, but we forget it right now. We will look and come back with an edit if we find it.
Edit: https://pivot-to-ai.com
Plural and not human, don’t refer to us with any human-related words or include us in humanity in any way. First ‘person’ pronouns will change based on who/what is talking.
Ask more questions, assume less.
Yes, but we forget it right now. We will look and come back with an edit if we find it.
Edit: https://pivot-to-ai.com
Perhaps you may enjoy this site then: https://www.web3isgoinggreat.com
An opportunity cost is the opposite of a sunk cost apparently: https://money.stackexchange.com/questions/46042/what-is-the-opposite-of-a-sunk-cost-a-sunk-gain
Yay! Sure, we are happy to help!
Oh, hmmm, no idea then.
Thanks for explaining!
Well, good news the newest update to Freetube now adds 4K+ support since they changed the library used to get the videos or something. I have tested it and the video says 4K and seems to be that. Feel free to correct me if you try the latest update and find any discrepancies.
Ah, okay. Thanks for explaining!
What version are you running? They released a new version of Freetube today.
Which version of Newpipe are you using? You’ll want to use their latest release repository rather than the ‘stable’ one, that seems to make it work.
[Genuine] Okay, why when Freetube exists though?
True heroes!
Also: Youth liberation, now!
That’s fair, you don’t have to know.
Also just to let you know, using ‘blind’ like that is ableist. It’s better to use something like “ignorant” or “not knowing/lacking knowledge” etc.
I agree that actual democracy is important. However, most voting is barely democracy.
The end goal would be direct democracy, but in the mean time under representative democracy systems first past the post isn’t a very good system for democracy, that honour really only falls to mixed member proportional respresentation (though any voting system is better than first past the post).
Definitely don’t install the bypass paywalls clean extension or script so you don’t have to take a single manual action to get around them. That would be extremely contraversial!
No, it shouldn’t necessarily be an expectation to check. However, if you don’t then I think it’s a reasonable expectation to not gender someone one way or another unless you do know or are corrected, using they/them and other neutral ways of referring to someone like person etc is the best idea if you can’t or don’t feel up to checking.
You can’t. Best to use they and other neutral ways of referring to some{one/many} unless you check or are corrected.
Some{one/many} should free those details.
LMAO, no it doesn’t not even close.