If he’s asking me, he’s an asshole. I choose to interpret it the way you did, and use it as a way to improve yourself and your community.
If he’s asking me, he’s an asshole. I choose to interpret it the way you did, and use it as a way to improve yourself and your community.
Well, we’re here talking about an important issue and he’ll be remembered forever.
What are you using your life for?
Why would a company dedicated to privacy concerns even entertain connecting to Google? I would imagine the customers using Proton would leave services that don’t value privacy, so why is it being invited back in? Seems like Proton may be changing which customers they value while holding onto name recognition. Enshitification continues.
Sounds like a shady deal with Alphabet for a financially struggling company that may or may not have a board which decided they liked money better than their customers one day.
Don’t let people tell you that “everything’s fine, don’t jump to conclusions”. I have no idea who that is or if they have a stake in this outside or a random Lemmy user, but I would imagine a lot of people would have a financial or other interest in ensuring the public continues to think Proton is safe and private.
Be willing to question and verify. Don’t be complacent.
Interesting that I just saw comnents the other day espousing Proton. Shame to see it go this direction based on those comments, but now I consider it could always have been a paid shill as corporations learn to mimic grassroot campaigns to control messages and set narratives. It’d be nice to see laws moving in that direction.
I don’t have a lot of sympathy for any of the idiots that buy these idiotic things.
I think the issue is moreso that you’re sending confidential health data to a 3rd party, which is where you lose control. You don’t know the intentions of people looking to steal that data, and you need to consider the worst possible outcome and guard against those. AI training is just one option. Get creative, what could you do with a doctor’s voice and their patient’s private medical history?
Simplest solution is to stop the arrangement until the company can prove data security on their end or implement an offline solution on local servers not connected to the internet.
It is until they prove it isn’t, which they might not be able to do. Many trusted 23andme only to see private data stolen. Make the company prove the security in place and the methods ensuring privacy, because you’ll essentially be liable for any failures of the system from a lack of due diligence.
And now they’re seen as a bunch of creeps that love peeping into your windows.
Removed by mod
Sounds like a precursor to taking them back.
Removed by mod
When will people realize they’re being fooled by lunatics trying to get power?
USA may have told them to tow the line if they wanted continued support.
Spending 1.2 billion on bombing campaigns keeps 1.2 billion in the American economy. Giving another country 600 million only exports money from their grasp.
Peace is not the point of the war machine.
Ubisoft directors might need to become comfortable hiding quietly in dark attics when the revolution comes.
Gotta make sure you have a generation ready to die of cancers over the next 40 years to drive pharmaceutical company profits somehow.
The funniest part of the article is the boomers complaining that the companies aren’t treating their customers right.
Silly Boomer, corporations aren’t your friends that want the best for you, they’re a vehicle to build wealth for the board executives by owning the necessities of your daily life.
Yo ho ho, shiver me timbers, what a crew the Jolly Roger is getting
This is delicious.
Get out of consequences of your shitty behaviour by doing more shitty things that hurt people.