Strictly speaking, that doesn’t really answer my question. Would you be physically holding onto designated copies for people?
Strictly speaking, that doesn’t really answer my question. Would you be physically holding onto designated copies for people?
What’s the point of you storing physical copies? Is this deal only valid at the time of sale, so you could essentially just put the physical copy back on the shelf if they want the ebook, and then just grab a copy if they wanted to exchange? Or are you planning on dedicating a large amount of storage space to the specific book each customer purchased and then wanted the ebook of?
Well Castro came to power via revolution in 1959, which pissed off the US, and started the push towards the Soviet Union. The nation also hosted Soviet nukes for a very brief time in 1962.
More detailed timeline found here, if you’re interested.
Operation Praying Mantis II: Naval Boogaloo?
In all likelihood, they’ve been open for business to make it easier to nab intellectual property from the rightful owners. China has probably just decided they’ve learned enough to make their own “homegrown” products, and can safely kick all the western businesses out of the market.
Like all these multi-level-marketing scams, the scam part is that you have to buy your stock from the company/from your “upline”, and then whether or not you make money depends on you reselling your stock.
John Oliver did an excellent video on the overall topic. Definitely worth the watch.
Removed by mod
Either South Korea or Vietnam! Not China, surprisingly!
Full disclaimer: I haven’t signed any agreements or anything with the company to build a house for me yet. True Built Homes just comes well recommended by a couple of co-workers of mine, and I’m working on moving in that direction myself.
I mean, similar to that argument, I’m not using Chinese software/hardware, so at least I’m doing something?
The only guarantee for privacy is to not be online at all, but that ship has sailed for all of us
Every country tries to hack each other. Doesn’t mean we should make it easy for them.
It’s not that far off. I’m near Seattle, and make approximately the same as the average RN in Washington State (~$100k), and I’m in the early stages of purchasing some land and building a house on it for myself. You can get the house built for around $250k, and the land for less than $100k if you shop for it. Which is certainly interesting given the average home in Washington State is $500k+.
Near as I can tell, Iran sold the plane to Venezuela in 2022, but it has been grounded in Argentina since then [for some reason I don’t quite get]. Argentina is trying to score brownie points with the US, so they handed the plane over to Washington, and that’s how we got this headline.
Report all those churches to the IRS. As soon as a church espouses support for a political candidate, they lose tax exempt status.
To add on, if your company matches for 401k contributions, NEVER put in less than the matching amount. Like, if they’ll match contributions up to 5%, never go below 5%. There are very few times you get legitimately free money in life, and this is one of them. Always put in more if you can, ofc, but the minimum should be the matching amount.
Because, as the warships are US flagged, all that matters for their conduct (until a UN resolution is passed or ICC takes action) is US Law.
Since the USN vessels are not within the internationally recognized jurisdiction of Yemen, Yemeni laws don’t apply. So it can’t really be illegal, then? Or is the law that no one, anywhere on earth, is allowed to disagree with them?
Yes it does. Look up the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, if you’re not being purposefully obtuse.
And as much as we may not like it, with the way US laws currently are, there is nothing illegal about USN vessels being in the Red Sea
Yes it does. Ships of any nation have a right to transit international waters.
When Iranian ships (or ships of any nation, really) engage in acts of privacy, then they open themselves up to the consequences, whatever those may be.
If a ship is in international waters, it has every right to be there, regardless of nationalities involved.
He was wearing one. Later in the BBC article it mentions him posting pictures of his ruined helmet on
twitterInstagram