My favourite type of posts is the ones by people signed up in one instance, posting in a community hosted by another instance about how they don’t understand how they are supposed to make use of federation. And then often still not getting it when people from all over the web tell them that they already are.

It makes sense though - federation is sold as a feature for users, but when done right the users should hardly notice it at all. So of course people end up a bit confused.

Seems like a community that has it’s natural home at programming.dev.

At some point recognisability is also worth something. I can immediately read this graph, I understand it, it’s good.

Occasionally it’s used in a confusing way where people assume it starts at zero despite it not being the case, and sometimes intentionally so. But that’s just the case here.

Well, it does make sense, doesn’t it?

What we’re interested in is not the number of users, but the trends: whether the number is increasing or decreasing over time. Starting the axis at 0 would not be useful in this regard, as the trend would be almost completely obscured.

That’s amazing! Fascinating that there’s so much variation within the species yet next to none between the genders.

Thanks for the answer!

Love them! When the male has much more efficient camouflage than the female, is this because it has a greater responsibility for gathering food, while she stays in the nest more? Or is the red colour better camouflage for somewhere else outside the tree?

I think a good approach could be to think about how you could reach users of different platforms.

A lot of Mastodon users follow hashtags, so including relevant hashtags (#accessibility and #blind seem like good starting points) might be a good idea. Tagging groups, such as @accessibility@a.gup.pe, might also help.

I think Kbin/Mbin might be better suited for this than Lemmy, as it integrates better with other federated networks. You can follow microbloggers and boost content, which in turn makes them likely to follow you back and creates a community beyond which Lemmy community you choose to post in. Your Mastodon followers will see your posts, but it won’t matter to them which community you post it in.

It’s hard for content to make the jump from Lemmy to Mastodon as Lemmy does not make itself discoverable, but as soon as content reaches Mastodon users nothing stops them from interacting with it (by boosting or replying).

Sadly Kbin.social lacks sufficiently active moderation these days, so you might be better off with an mbin instance. I also have no idea how accessible Mbin is to blind users.

Edit: I over-emphasized the point about reaching a broader audience. If you want to discuss a narrow topic but you don’t want most ActivityPub users to see it because you don’t value their input, I guess Lemmy is as good as it gets.

I appreciate your efforts!

In an ideal world it would always be possible to credit the photographer, but I guess that’s sadly unrealistic.

If there’s an interest for fakes I guess the could be a “Fowl Friday” or something like that every month, where fake owls are allowed/encouraged if properly tagged. I guess the value would be educational, showing people how to tell that impressive-looking wildlife photography is fake. You’re an expert of this, and it’s very much appreciated that you share your insights. :)

If anything, this proves that forking Mastodon is a great idea. Not because any useful software would come out of it, but it would distract some of the annoying armchair managers out there.

The biggest problem with Mastodon isn’t the lack of feature X or the presence of feature Y; it’s those exact assholes, draining the energy and enthusiasm from anything that crosses their path while scaring away anyone looking for a meaningful conversation.

I hate to break it to you, but if you genuinely think you’ve figured it all out, chances are you’re a fucking moron.

I have posted some pictures I’ve taken from hikes, and check in now and then when I feel like posting something or looking at pictures.

My experience is very different from what other people here seem to report. I am just posting into the void, I have posted 11 pictures to date, and I never linked the account to anything or told anyone about it. Still I have more than 50 followers, only from people who stumbled over my content and decided to follow. I’m only following half of that number, so it’s not a politeness thing.

I’ve also gotten a few comments, though mostly people just click like and/or boost. It seems every time I post something I gain at least a follower or two.

So overall I’m pretty impressed by PixlFed. If you have something to share it’s a good platform to do so. And there’s nice landscape photography on there, at least.

PieFed is also a nice project, though it doesn’t do microblogging so it’s more of a Lemmy alternative.

I guess the whole point here is that people come from different platforms - I’m not sure it makes too much sense to include the platform in the community name at all. General names like ‘AskFedi’ or AskAround’ would make a lot more sense in my book. I don’t really care all that much which software a community is hosted on.

Also it’s a bigger market of lawyers, so probably easier and cheaper to get high quality legal help against bullshit like this.

I think it is a pretty major issue. A single-user instance shouldn’t need more than 100 GB. The internet is too bloated, which is a democratic problem as well as an environmental one.

It’s of some importance for the Fediverse in particular, as we want to have a system of many independent instances with low running costs and minimal environmental footprints. A bloated piece of software running on one centralized server is different from it running on thousands of decentralized ones, and higher running costs means that instances are more likely to disappear rendering the network more fragile.

Of course it’s not the biggest problem out there, but I think it’s important enough that it should be a priority.

They should have been giving their money to Bridgy Fed, which is working to bridge the actual content of social media rather than the app APIs.

Well, actually, I would much rather Bridgy remains independent from Dorsey’s blood money. Bluesky should just enable federation on a large scale so that it’ll actually be possible to build services around it. Right now they cap federated instances at ten users, which is a complete joke.