Nah it was everyone’s business before that. People “drink responsibly”. They can and do imbibe other drugs responsibly.
You sound really judgey about forget-me-nows
I don’t make the rules, and spacial reasoning is an art not a science
Absolutely try reversing y axis, in shooters.
Maybe flip the controller if you can, some people prefer look and strafe on the wrong thumb sticks.
It’s uhhhh
Conveniently listed in the link
Did NPR give you an IP ban or something?
If you ignore a bunch of stuff yeah Biden is is just another warmonger neoliberal, and you seem like you are cherry picking to drive a narrative
Yeah same re: purchasing convenience vs pirating.
Pirating is a juicy prospect once again.
But your premise is bad
Yeah don’t do that
Basically collecting information on the movement of documents is a security risk in itself.
Papers in a flaming trash can are secured. Not much else.
I deal with consumer data analytics, and the scheme that you are positing does expose the frequency and density of specific actors and their access to classified information. This is really valuable, you can tell when someone gets a promotion and maybe has access to more info then they are used to or some other exploitable paradigm.
If it’s just a printed barcode sure, it could be tracked like this without exposing information. Trouble is that classified documents are living documents, and the information only becomes classified when it’s collected by some operative or officer, who may or may not register the documents with this central tracking authority.
The next issue is the capability of the central tracking authority to review, access, curate all of the reports that it has received, and their confidence that their internal staff do not breach the access rules on these documents hello Snowden.
You might have shot somebody’s last wishes, you Ponce
If this is about the concept of investigators being heavily siloed into independent investigations about the same crime… No this is the opposite. There are no investigators, because there is basically zero information about the activities.
He ate papers he has been intentionally obscuring the information he’s had access to the entire time that he’s been receiving privileged information.
I like that book, but it’s been long enough you will have to lead me into the parallel you are making.
With long range RFID readers existing that is bad opsec. You don’t need to know the contents of a document to exploit it’s dissemination, in certain cases.
Philip k dick is SciFi I think you mean Orwell
I disagree with you because there should be strong opsec around certain topics, and auditors aren’t the author of the documents, they are a 3rd party tracking their dissemination.
I think the absence of Bluetooth and the knowledge how to butcher an animal is enough to interdict your shit brother