bedrooms

I mean, if you argue that way during the interview I’d pass… Nobody thinks you’re asked to do all that in a one-day interview.

Yes, the Socratic method

What an excellent scheme to keep talents away from entering the red states for a job.

Agreed.

deleted by creator

I’m from Japan. They don’t even have judges as corrupt as SCOTUS and still don’t allow same sex marriage because the ruling party is conservative. Well, the court ruled it’s unconstitutional, but we learned that a law in this country can stay unconstitutional if the government ignores the situation. And apparently 90% of the people (at least on the internet) support that because they are conservative.

Makes me realize how broken my country is. It doesn’t even count as corruption because it’s lawful. Fucking hell…

Nah, that’s rather what right wingers do.

Sometimes I wonder if POTUS could declare national emergency due to an unhinged SCOTUS.

Maybe even that depends on the judges.

I noticed. What I wanted to say was it can become a battle between the correct belief and the wrong belief. Especially if the law itself is interpreted wrongly and scientific evidence is difficult to acquire (which sometimes is).

Also, they often don’t read more than a few lines. I applied as a dev for a company which I had many friends inside. They all knew my skills. The problem was the high-level managers because they didn’t read the memo (and didn’t even read my CV), assumed I can’t do engineering because I was an academic at the time.

an engineering manager said during an interview, “OK, we’re going to build a To Do List app right now,” a process that might normally take weeks.

Tbf you can do that in one day with ChatGPT, although it requires some generic software engineering skills. But that’s the point.

Even if you don’t complete the task, the process of coding can prove your skill level in a positive way.

IANAL, but I dare guess judges do need beliefs. In the beginning, people thought Black people were not humans, and so equality of people in constitution did not apply. I might be factually wrong on this, but let’s assume it. To overcome this, some judges had to abandon their racism and understand black people are people.

And while some areas of human issues can be discussed scientifically, like racism being completely wrong, some are difficult.

And if science can’t overcome an unjust law today, judges have to listen to their heart and do the right thing. Probably the left thing these days, though…

Tbf it was always a nightmare to manage driver conflicts on Windows 95.

I feel like Google results these days value the domain rather than the individual webpages instead. Always the same websites…

This: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_comparison

The pattern is, the latter are targets of Russian operations, and so far it seems to be successful at generating kompromats.

Sure, diff tools aren’t meant for this. At least you could try dedicated backup tools like borg.

Another thing: schedule the backup to happen while you sleep or have lunch.

The consequence of falling behind is gravely different from most heinous acts. It can impact the military, elections, espionage, or whatever.

As I always write, trying to restrict AI training on the ground of copyright will only backfire. The sad truth is that malicious parties (dictatorships) will get more training materials because they won’t abide by rules. The end result is, dictators would outperform democracies in terms of future generation AIs, if we treat AI training like human reading.