Killed?

I found it easier than BotW. I died here and there, but I never thought any part was impossible to beat. I’m not a pro player, I’m a middle aged guy with a small family.

But in both games, combat is by far the worst thing in the game.

Maybe you didn’t upgrade your armors enough?

Because people buy the game anyway. So why stop?

I have never even heard my joycons vibrating unless they’re vibrating against a solid surface like a table or the floor.

I didn’t even know they released a Super Mario 3D World 2.

Please, let’s not allow memes.

Any community that allows memes will quickly become 95% worthless memes and 5% useful content.

My favorite part is having to explain a rule for the 17th time.

You’re talking about the room to retrieve the arm or leg for the construct?

I just went through that room yesterday.

You just hang the hook sideways and problem solved. It will pass through all the supports, carrying the box.

You’re talking about the room to reduce the arm or leg for the construct?

I just went through that room yesterday.

You just hang the hook sideways and problem solved. It will pass through all the supports, carrying the box.

It should be Lemmy Sync. Because Sync for Reddit was originally called Reddit Sync, if I’m not mistaken.

The name only changed because some time ago Reddit started with arbitrary rules for third party apps, even deciding how they should be called.

I think that 4E was doing something similar to what some games like Dungeon World do.

The description of the Fireball spell in 4E is super short. But although it doesn’t say that the spell is supposed to burn stuff, it has the “Fire” keyword, it’s described as fire damage in the “Hit” part, and the fluff description mentions a flame that explodes. So I believe that the idea is to paint a general image of what the spell does, but leaving the actual flavor and consequences up to your gaming table.

Because one of the problems with D&D (be it 3E, 5E, or some other editions) is that they try to describe everything an action can or can’t do. But they can’t possibly list every possible consequence of any action, because they have limited space.

And this kind of rules book creates a mentality (in some players) of rules lawyers saying that if something obvious isn’t described, then it doesn’t happen. And if a game does that enough, it can create DMs that are too rigid instead of interpreting what’s happening in the world.

I remember that the spell to create bonfires in 5E even say that throwing water at your bonfire will extinguish the flames, or something like that. Do we really need a game to say that?

4E tried having terse descriptions, and leaving the rest up to you. I really like that. So it says that Fireball creates a flame that explodes, engulfing everything in its area. If one of it’s targets is holding an important letter (made of paper) in their hands, it should burn.

That was not one of the biggest problems of 4E at all.

I even think that, like the other answer to this comment said, leaving the fluff out of the description is not even a bad thing. It means I can add my own flavor to the spell.

I think that complaint is mostly about the kind of gamer you are. If you expect the game to provide everything for you, or if you like to add your own roleplay flavor on top of cool mechanics.