![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
I’m also curious. A quick search came up with these. Not sure which one is most reliable/updated
I’m also curious. A quick search came up with these. Not sure which one is most reliable/updated
Many things are called “AI models” nowadays (unfortunately due to the hype). I wouldn’t dismiss the tools and methodology yet.
That said, the article (or the researchers) did a disservice to the analysis by not including a link to the report (and code) that outlines the methodology and how the distribution of similarities look. I couldn’t find a link in the article and a quick search didn’t turn up anything.
Lol ads that can be engineered into DNA, so that they can be passed down for generations.
Based on this reddit comment, that website is not affiliated with the magic-wormhole
CLI tool
doesn’t seem to be so comfortable with glasses, esp with a hoodie unfortunately
ah gotcha, you meant ISP-provided devices
never turn on ISP-supplied WiFi
maybe I’m missing something here, how do you get access to the internet for all devices (mobiles, laptops, …) without wifi then?
Backend of this is OpenAI / LLM; so my guess is if OP knows what they want, they can prompt such models or chatbots in such a manner to achieve the desired styles.
this may make it easier tho. as in, why set up another instance when you can just buy it from a well-known player?
Do we know whether federated content (say from Lemmy or Mastodon) with these sites may be under the deal as well?
re 1: out of curiosity, do you encounter dnsleaks when using wireguard?
re 4: you can also check out https://starship.rs/, which helps configure shell prompt very intuitively with a toml file.
“Bad” can be quite broad and it might be cumbersome to check and categorize all of the “badness” out there. You might have better luck narrowing down a bit. For example, if you’re interested in AI/algorithm incidences, there are at least two that came up on search:
On a tangential note of another comment about AI training and such, this is a touchy and evolving subject, but it might be good to include how you want your content to be used and not be used, and by whom, especially if you intend to make them public.
some wiki backends allow password protection. for example, mkdocs, which also renders markdown, has mkdocs-encryptcontent-plugin to allow global or even page-specific passwords for private repos.
but these encrypted pages would of course have the risk of not being archived by the wayback machine.
How is the entity or power that has the ability to grant me such knowledge connected to the existence of the universe?
can people not use that to take each other’s shops down?
what are the other alternatives to ENV that are more preferred in terms of security?
yeah I guess maybe the formatting and the verbosity seems a bit annoying? Wonder what the alternatives solution could be to better engage people from mastodon, which is what this bot is trying to address.
edit: just to be clear, I’m not affiliated with the bot or its creator. This is just my observation from multiple posts I see this bot comments on.
sounds like this can be a plot of a new Pixar movie