• 4 Posts
  • 76 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle



  • m0darn@lemmy.catoScience Memes@mander.xyzAcademic writing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Not who you’re responding to but I must vehemently disagree. In English, which doesn’t have a centralized governing body, the correct way of pronouncing/spelling something depends on your intention and expected audience. If your intended audience is English speakers then the correct spelling is probably octopi or octopuses, whichever you believe will cause the least confusion/distraction (surely it varies regionally).

    However, usually my intention is to portray my unfathomably superior knowledge and intellect, so the correct spelling/pronunciation in this case is: octopodes (which I think he had listed but ironically got ‘corrected’ to ‘octopuses’).





  • m0darn@lemmy.catoScience Memes@mander.xyzAcademic writing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 days ago

    I don’t read much (/any) academic writing, but does it really misuse words the way the link portrays?

    Eg

    • academic writing isn’t prose, like that’s almost the definition of prose.
    • intra-specialized doesn’t mean anything (the intra prefix didn’t work on adjectives)
    • “obfuscating … accessibility” means making it difficult to see that it is accessible, where the author probably actually wants to say “reducing the ability of outsiders to access the meaning”

    I get that it is satire, but imo it would be better satire if he put in the work to actually make it mean something. Unless the point is that academic writers misuse thesauruses this badly.



  • m0darn@lemmy.catoScience Memes@mander.xyzSeconds
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Yeah true, but I think they actually use wavelength of red shift, which is distance… traveled by light in the time it takes to make a full cycle. So I guess we’re back to seconds again.

    I think they use this for distance and time because at scales being dealt with they have the same implications.






  • If they know these people are active criminals they will have no problem citing just cause for arrest and search.

    I live in Canada, our gun rules are different than the USA. This week in my city some charges against a dangerous criminal were dropped because the police had a “flagrant disregard for charter rights” (according to the judge) (oir charter rights are similar to American civil rights)

    They searched him improperly, and found a loaded, illegal gun. Charges dismissed. If they had handled it properly they could have made the charges stick. What a waste of everyone’s time. Police didn’t respect his rights because they don’t respect my rights.