Then sincerely hope that doesn’t impact any investigation by the authorities.

Maybe not. Ample time to make an independent judgement whether to downvote.

OP, if you suspect financial crimes are being committed, you should not be tipping off those involved by publicising this.

10 minutes is a long time on the internet.

“Authentic engagement”? It’s been a matter of minutes since you accused people on Lemmy of being sockpuppets…

Em, no. No it isn’t. Private healthcare gets to cherry pick off all the more straightforward stuff (knee replacements, dermatology) but curiously enough is quite content for the NHS to handle all the expensive stuff (intensive care, trauma).

It took over 40 years to privatise everything on that list. Not exactly “fairly quick”.

Feel free to consider it “scaremongering bollocks” all you like, but be aware that government ministers literally wrote a book about how much they want to do it.

And be aware everyone thought that British Rail would never be privatised, either. But of course it was. After it had been run into the ground through underfunding.

Wow. Patients given choice? Perish the thought! You should be forced to have mediocre healthcare, peasant!

Do you think private healthcare is illegal in the UK or something? Have you not heard of people going private?

It is a bold move to say that “Tories want to privatise nationalised services” is a conspiracy theory, given the number of times they have already done it.

• British Aerospace
• British Gas
• British Airways
• British Petroleum (BP)
• All 10 Regional Water Authorities
• National Power
• British Rail
• Royal Mail
• The National Probation Service
• The Forensics Science Service

ETA: They also tried it with the Forestry Commission.

It was thought that British Rail was so beloved that no one would dare sell that off, too.

It’s not very good now that the Tories have starved it of funds for over a decade with a view to selling it off.

In 2005, Direct Democracy: An Agenda For A New Model Party was co-authored Jeremy Hunt Michael Gove, David Gauke, and Kwasi Kwarteng, among others.

On page 78, it states that

Our ambition should be to break down the barriers between private and public provision, in effect denationalising the provision of health care in Britain.

And on page 74 asserts that

patients, either through the tax system or by way of universal insurance, [should] purchase health care from the provider of their choice

NHS c. 2009 was excellent. Don’t forget that.

It is not an appropriate word to use when talking to a teacher, no. A “pretty mild” swearword is still a swearword.

I quit with the death of RiF.

Well regarded.

Return of the Obra Dinn.

“Female” as an adjective isn’t the problem. The problem is “female” as a noun.

You can describe a person as being female all you like, but if you start calling them “a female” & defined purely in terms of the existence of their sex organs, you’re in the wrong.

Yes, I’ve seen the screenshot. Eh. It’s a gross post, and apparently OP acted like twat; I won’t lose sleep over it not getting attention.

All the top posts on r/askwomennocensor seem to be women complaining about how the sub is overrun with men asking for dating tips, with the mods stating in a thread 16 days ago:

We remove a thing, and suddenly we get called fascist, tyrant, “chronically online,” etc., and members wildly upvote those public callouts.

Yall gotta decide if yall want “fascist tyrants” or to be plagued with inane incel questions. We remove a dating question? “Tyrants!” We let it go? “Why is this sub so trashy?”

As one redditor notes:

I know this sub was created because the other asksubs have so many rules. But this is unfortunately one of the reasons why so many rules exist.

… unwelcoming of misogyny? Surprising.

When it’s used like that it is.

You wouldn’t describe a man as “a male”, and you wouldn’t refer to your mother as “a female”.

No problem. There’s a lot of confusing stuff surrounding homebuying.

What? There is no limit on the size of funds that can be gifted to help buy a house in the UK. If your family wants to bung you £500k of their own money there’s nothing stopping them.

The requirement to demonstrate proof of funds for that money is to prevent money laundering.

The UK had Grenfell just a few years ago.

https://youtu.be/KczK1kGhp1I

The part complaining about a lack of Russian state-controlled news media?