![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Exactly my thinking they can ban the account then what hope they dont create another one.
Exactly my thinking they can ban the account then what hope they dont create another one.
What can Amazon do tho what laws have been broken?
Have u tried tiny 11. And Chris Titus debloater can kill a lot of crap with those as it removes most of the shit.
Have u considered running windows in a vm or using https://github.com/casualsnek/cassowary
The solution is post tagging ive seen some discussion on implementation but i dont believe it federates with mastodon tags.
Left is literally hitler.
Communism
The thing is technology is neutral. How we use it isnt.
Man i dont think u quite understand or on lemmy a federated foss environment with no ads. Usually when advertising as u are u have something to offer people that they want. What are u offering us that the rest of the fediverse doesnt have.
Where’s the source video
Something’s a little fishy with all the hate i recon.
Probably cos google keeps breqkibb things for it. Ive also found a lot of things work fine if u spoof user agent so i recon real people real issues fake cause.
From my understanding of this it means client side signing of actions would be supported?
It seems that accounts (actor objects) can now just be a static file hosted anywhere which lowers the bar for entry of self hosting. Id love to see something about supporting .onion addresses when looking up this file would allow self hosted anonymous identity while not requiring support for a whole instance as a hidden service.
Sorry hit reply to the wrong comment couldn’t be fucked to fix it.
U can obviously use asymmetric key cryptography someone sends their public key u encrypt with that then upload they then decrypt.
How does piefed compare python/flask is far easyer to develop I really think moving away from developer with such extreme politics is a good idea.
If u make privacy illegal then only criminals will have privacy.
Shit thats not good if its true
It means that each actor can only expose themselves to a subset (more peers less people) of the total network. As opposed to the current situation where u can collect information on more people as a singular actor. But yes you do expose yourself to the peers you connect to.
The security issues are minimised compared to havibg a centralised instance. And yeah some ISP may block/rate limit thats why net neutrality is so important.
Fuck the spellin nazis are out strong today. Gotta ensure purity of language ey?