![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/cd7879c3-cd1c-4108-806e-f9ca45e9b22a.png)
Really? You expected Trump to base his speech on facts?
Really? You expected Trump to base his speech on facts?
That should have been expected from Trump. Biden should have memorized statistics to counter the predictable bullshit.
Not that memorizing stuff is important for the job but it would have been effective in the debate for viewers who just won’t fact check anything.
there was so much jumping around and avoiding questions that it was not very helpful.
Trump did this, but where did Biden do it?
they can in turn use it as a point when luring advertisers.
Wouldn’t that be shared only with potential advertisers upon request via a password rather than just making it publicly available?
I am only speculating, are you?
RadioLab covered the dawning of the (serendipitous) discovery a few years ago called: “bringing back gamma”.
That does not answer my question.
No I don’t trust their methodology. In fact I am suspicious the numbers are entirely fictitious. I imagine they are highly guarded confidential information which is not public.
I meant $100k (not $100). I doubt he will get costs even if he wins. She also got an AVO out against him based on this. Claims it has ruined her business (she wants $100k for lost revenue despite not showing tax returns) and that she fears for her life complete with waterworks in the hearing (despite him living interstate).
The current political climate is biased in her favour. After the Higgins trial win Larissa Waters tweeted “I believe women”.
He subpoenaed mug shots of the women arrested at the rally but none are of her. Seems the police are in on it, using her as a honeypot to attract the extremists. Courts protect police.
And where does he get the traffic data from?
The websites would be guarding that and Google Analytics (if installed/enabled) would not divulge it to a third party.
deleted by creator
Symmetrical transparency.
It was Edward Snowden who said that “Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.”
Nikki Haley voting for Trump after he called her a birdbrain proves his point.
But the Australian eSafety Commissioner isn’t giving up her “won’t someone think of the children” rhetoric.
And good news in Australia (despite the disingenuous headline).
News today: vote has been postponed.
deleted by creator
My admin friend told me that all email is now secure and encrypted by default.
Of course you have to trust whoever is hosting your email though. Don’t trust Gmail, yahoo, hotmail etc
She could have just denied it was her in the video. It is impossible to prove if someone denies it.
In Australia my friend identified a woman appearing clearly in a TV news bulletin being arrested at an anti-lockdown rally and complaining loudly. In fact it was official supplementary extended footage from the TV station uploaded to youtube: about 20 seconds of just her.
She is denying it was her though and is suing him for defamation. It has cost him over US$100 so far and the hearing day has not even arrived.
I suspect the ranting author failed to appreciate that Bluetooth is probably cheaper to implement for the audio because regular headphones require three wires while power supply only requires two. Ingenious really.
EDIT: Proper wired headphones would also require a soundcard in the dongle.
Thanks. Google Analytics doesn’t work that way though does it?